(October 6, 2017 at 3:31 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(October 6, 2017 at 3:21 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Go out and search for stats that tell us how often people successfully protect their homes with their guns, VS, how often guns in the hands of civilians end up in a death in the family or friends of the gun-owner.
When you have real data, you can make a claim one way or the other.
While one is at it, they can search for the stats on how much gun control effects violent crime rates.
I don't own a firearm, and don't really see the need for me to have one at this time. However, if I did fee that I needed that kind of protection I would want it available.
However I do think that focusing on the means used, is ignoring the real issue which is a social problem.
Yep... start with recent examples, like Australia and work down to more ancient ones, like the UK.
Availability, ok, but not uncontrolled availability. You shouldn't be able to buy a gun like you buy a candy bar. And this is the real issue.
Somehow, people in the US feel the need to have guns, for whatever reason.
Somehow, that need is not present in Canada, in my eyes, the country more similar to the US.
What's the difference?