RE: Just because She's Topless
January 3, 2018 at 3:18 pm
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2018 at 3:36 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
(January 3, 2018 at 2:23 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Doing quite well at avoiding them and trying to shift the burden on me as well.What burden, lol? I told you I'm not interested in bickering with you about whether or not sexual assault is objectively harmful. I think that you're entirely full of shit. There's no burden for you to meet that you haven't already met.
Quote:How does this apply to the video in question? I still waiting for you to point out where the objective harm is, as well as what you mean by objective (as it doesn't appear to match the normal definitions).-and you'll be waiting forever. If you don't know by now that grabbin 'em by the pussy is harmful..I suspect that you never will. It was your parents job to help you reach that conclusion, if you needed help. Not mine.
Quote:I wasn't making any such statement or really any statement at all. I was asking a related question. Do you think one can be violated or abused by what someone says?JAQing off, again.
If you want to find a less flaccid example of some subtelety or vaguery needing to be accounted for in a case of when we might be morally justified (oir even morally given the mulligan) in harming some person, then do so. This example is not one of them, there is no vaguery or subtlety in this.
If you commit a sex crime, you should accept that you have consented to being jacked in the face. That's the price for playing the rape game, at the very least. There is no universe in which I'm going to consider the sex offender the victim when his victim decks him. I'm not going to humor you, in the slightest, about this. Nor will I cease reminding you, again and again..that if you were looking for some example to provide cogent criticism of moral realism, this example is a particularly dismal failure.
I have a moral realism master thread, by the by..perhaps some question regarding justifications for harm in harm based realist ethics would generate the conversation you want, rather than the embarrassing display we've been subject to thusfar? I can offer plenty (not all of which I would agree with), having given it alot of thought.....as a retired professional harm-er who likes to read boring morality shit and mull over my culpability at the bottom of a bottle, lol.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
