RE: Why believe the bible?
July 2, 2018 at 1:31 pm
(This post was last modified: July 2, 2018 at 1:45 pm by Angrboda.)
(July 2, 2018 at 1:19 pm)Drich Wrote:(July 2, 2018 at 12:55 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Well, you're ignoring that Genesis 1 explicitly states that "adam" created at that time was created in God's image. But I'm curious to know upon what you basis do you rest this theory about the one referring to mankind in Genesis 1, and that it was a proper name in the second? Are you trying to suggest that God has the form of an ape man? That would be contrary to all Jewish theology up to the present day.
what a dishonest person you are. I cut and pasted a copy of an actual translation where the word humanity was used instead of the word or nae Adam and then gave a comprehensive list of a dozen other well known and well received bibles who all translate the hebrew word "adam" in Genesis 1 as mankind humanity ect..
Are you so foolish as to not understand the hebrew word Adam is not limited to a name?
or is this where you believe you own hype that "i truly don't know what I know?" and all you got to do is post a pic of a page from a lexicon?
Have you forgotten I brought that particular piece of source material to this website under much mocking and hate as you people did not even know what one was?!?! Now you pretend that I cant use one or don't have access to one?
Maybe it is you who doesn't know what she thinks she knows...
That doesn't answer my question. See my previous post for more on the matter that was added after my initial post.
I'm well aware that the Hebrew isn't restricted to solely a name, as that was in the citation from Strong's which you referenced (in addition to already knowing that fact).
You still haven't adequately justified your interpretation that in Genesis 1, adam does not refer to the creation of Adam, whereas Genesis 2 does.
I'm also interested in hearing more about why you think God has the form or genetic material of an ape-man.