(October 10, 2018 at 4:26 pm)Drich Wrote: If there is moral ambiguity ever, when it comes to killing a child/baby infant.. then that person, or society or even life form who can not definitively defend an infant or has to prove it is wrong to kill an infant, does not/should not have any lock on life themselves. Meaning if you need to argue whether or not a infant should live, then you also should be made to argue why you should live.
because no matter the circumstance it is not the child's fault or problem.
That said if you can come to terms with killing a child then you should be free to be as big a monster as you want to be, maybe killing your own child will bring you to God and if that what it takes for you than who am I to judge that??? however at the same time the rest of the country should not be asked to pay for anything or even allow this in a given state if they do not wish it. However in Zombie states where Satan reigns and the people of that state would sell their children into slavery or consume them as zombies do, then it would be better for the child to return to God rather than to be sold or worse yet be allowed/made to live with a zombie and when old enough be a zombie.
Zombie being representative of any human plight or failure in human rights.
If you have truth on your side, why do you lie about your opponents? No one is claiming it's okay to kill babies, we're claiming zygotes aren't babies.
I find your debate tactics hate-filled and deplorable, so that's it for me.
(How do you place someone on ignore in this forum?)
