(January 8, 2019 at 1:38 pm)Drich Wrote:(January 8, 2019 at 1:18 pm)Nihilist Virus Wrote: I ask for evidence and you ramble about spiritual bullshit.Again the evidence is the maturing of the writing and how it reflects the ever growing nature of how we are to live and work in this religion. It is intuitive and logically progression one by the very nature of his letter could almost come to the same conclusions he did given a strong enough bond with the Holy Spirit. the fact that you do not see this again disqualifies you from judging what you clearly do not understand in even the most basic of ways.
If you still want evidence and still do not understand you are not smart enough to recognize it I will again point out Paul the subject of your objection did not have anything to do with the subject being discussed.
So a completely different writing style and vocabulary is NOT evidence of a different author but IS evidence of a deity changing the writing style of the original author. Hmmm. Yeah. Right. This is what we call ad hoc. You're making the evidence conform to your conclusion, which is the opposite of the correct method of argumentation. Unless you're a lawyer and lying is your job.
Jesus is like Pinocchio. He's the bastard son of a carpenter. And a liar. And he wishes he was real.