(March 29, 2019 at 3:31 pm)Acrobat Wrote:(March 29, 2019 at 3:22 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: Yes... but you're using the mutually agreed upon terms/symbols just to type that concept, no?
Would you be able to make heads or tails out of the above if it were expressed in, say, Cuniform B for example?
Now, I'm not saying certain concepts can't be ubiquitous.....
But the methods of expressing said concepts certainly are not.
You're referring to the language used to express such concepts, I'm referring to what the language and symbols represents. If I gave you a pineapple and another pineapple later, you'll have two pineapples, regardless if I expressed this in hindi, or with a series of grunts.
Yes... I already agreed that certain 'Thing's are/might be ubiquitous.
'Splan' 'GLecvk' Splan' 'Spleed' 'Glorf', however, just doesn't have the same ring as some of your other examples now, does it?
We're of the agreement that language is subjective. At a base level. Like, all of it, yes?