Does humanity deserve Corona?

[Mr Greene]

The claim was that 'Imperialism' was to blame for economic inequalities. All 4 examples were governed by the same administration, 2 became Islamic republics on Independence, 2 did not. They all form part of the same economic region. The difference is the religious attitude to finance.
Indeed it was the Islamic attitude to finance that led to them become colonies in the first place.

Sorry, but this is just a restatement of your earlier assertion. It doesn't tell me any more than before.

No doubt these seem like simple questions to you, but I honestly don't know.

What exactly is the "Islamic attitude to finance"? How does it differ from other countries? Is it identical in all Muslim-majority countries?

Is this attitude solely responsible for economic trouble in former colonies? Or only in the ones you name? Can one point to any other issues in Bangladesh, for example, that would harm its economy? 

You said earlier that Christian countries got over the bad financial advice in their scripture, so I'm guessing that Christian countries which are economic basket cases can't blame religion. But the Congo and numerous former colonies in South America have had a lot of trouble economically, and they are majority Catholic. In those cases, surely their status as former colonies and non-Islamic finance policies are to blame.

Islam declares payment of Interest to be Haram. Obviously this creates issues with obtaining finance (though most rich Islamic leaders choose to ignore the restriction when it comes to their personal finance, at least until it comes to paying them off...).

In the case of India, Mirza Shuja ud-din Muhammad Khan, Nawab of Bengal in common with most Mughal leaders believed that his palaces should be large and lavishly decorated. This was financed by loans from Bengal's Hindu bankers. However he  decided that as a muslim he shouldn't have to pay their interest and when summoned regarding his missed payments he threatened the bankers with forced conversion to Islam and circumcision.
Obviously the bankers didn't take this well and convinced the commander of the Palace Guard, Alivardi Khan, to betray and depose Mirza Shuja ud-din Muhammad Khan and supported his claiming the throne.
Alivardi Khan himself took out loans and the process repeated with Alivardi Khan being deposed by Sarfaraz Khan (son of  Mirza Shuja ud-din Muhammad Khan) but yet again this led to arguments with his bankers who this time decided to invite the East India Company to take over Bengal. 
This provided to Bengal and ultimately to India as whole as the Company did not owe the bankers,(though individual employees did resulting in the bulk of Indian revenue being retained by the Indian banks.)

Bengal was the richest state in India (The whole of the British Empire in fact) and on independence became partitioned into West Bengal under Delhi and East Pakistan, now Bangladesh as an Islamic republic. Bangladesh has collapsed economically following this. 

This scenario is played through even today with Muslims taking out loans then refusing to pay on the basis that 'as Muslims the agreements they signed don't apply to them'. as a result all Muslims get poor credit ratings.