(March 30, 2020 at 7:23 pm)Belacqua Wrote:(March 30, 2020 at 7:32 am)Mr Greene Wrote: You're claiming you need to understand Augustine in order to understand eg; Ken Ham?
If you want to pretend that Ken Ham is an accurate representation of a huge and diverse group of people, then you shouldn't read Augustine.
Or Aquinas, or Dante, or Cusanus, or Boehme, or Weil, or many others.
Not that diverse. Ham represents the worlds creationists and there are ~160 million of the deranged fucks in the US alone. So yes, he is an accurate representation.
Miserable Bastard.