Is there a contradiction in the Qur'an?

[The Architect Of Fate]

Okay, pal. I got it. You consider these conversations to be useless. Stay true to your word and don't bring this up, especially when you're not ready to have a lengthy discussion about the supposed mistakes. What you're doing now is a meta discussion, even more useless.....

I'm explaining to you how you have made them useless.  

You can use this information to improve your delivery - or not.

Further examples of exactly how you fuck the pooch follow below.

You got it. More importantly, it doesn't contain any mistakes. Just say out loud atheists so we can move on.

No one handed me anything, pal. People here just type errors in the Qur'an in any search engine and vomit what they find. Not that I blame them, but I expected to have a challenge worthy of skeptics that really looked up abrahamic religions... or not

It's a miracle, except when it isn't, which it is...and it's accurate, except when it isn't, but it doesn't need to be because that's not the point of magic book - and it wouldn't mean anything if magic book got it wrong..

Which it does....but, obviously, given the litany of bad faith arguments and incompetent reasons™ you've spouted off just in this thread, just in these last few hours...couldn't possibly matter to you.  I've always been ready to state a fact and move on, especially when that fact isn't really pertinent to the underlying contention.

If you'll recall, I found no point in arguing over whether mistakes are mistakes, because it doesn't matter that there are mistakes in magic book - it's just not surprising that a google search will turn up an endless buffet of them.

So us actually providing sources is apparently bad 

---

I am just asking to show me exactly, where the Qur'an got it wrong. Just go back and read the first attempt Ire made. Is copy pasting five verses decribing various stuff amounts to a mistake.......? Is that the best you can do.?

If it's trivial to you that our holy book is not holy... help us then get to that, by bringing trivially clear mistakes ...?

Too which you have and will provide nothing but mental gymnastics and excuses

It matters to me a lot. I suggest you take some time - or someone else, to really get to the bottom of these claimed mistakes. If you think otherwise that I'm fine with reading a book I know is filled with mistakes for two decades now,....well, I'm not fine with that.

1.So far we have and you have not 

2.No i think you are fine with it 

3.The length of time is irrelevant