(May 29, 2020 at 7:07 pm)Belacqua Wrote: An argument from ignorance would be more like "I have never seen anything supernatural. I don't know how it could work. Therefore I conclude it's impossible."
The fact that we are ignorant of how the supernatural would work may constitute evidence against the supernatural, depending on the model you're using to interpret things. But as a logical argument it's not sufficient.
After countless requests you are still unable to furnish a definition of the word supernatural so why should I take anything you have to say on the subject Seriously?
Miserable Bastard.