RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
May 30, 2020 at 11:14 am
(This post was last modified: May 30, 2020 at 11:16 am by Succubus#2.)
(May 30, 2020 at 11:02 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: So another topic went into people trying to determine what Belacqua is trying to say. Let me break it to you: Belacqua doesn't know what he is trying to say.
I think his tagline sums him up nicely: Religious Views Um...
The 'Um...' applies to everything he's ever said. How can he ever be wrong when he never actually says anything.
(May 30, 2020 at 11:11 am)possibletarian Wrote:(May 30, 2020 at 11:02 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: So another topic went into people trying to determine what Belacqua is trying to say. Let me break it to you: Belacqua doesn't know what he is trying to say.
I've pretty much come to that conclusion, almost like he's arguing from a third-person or multiple personality perspective but offering nothing at all.
And when people say they they don't understand what he's saying, he counts that as a win.
My emphasis.
Bingo!
Miserable Bastard.