RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
June 2, 2020 at 6:24 pm
(This post was last modified: June 2, 2020 at 6:31 pm by Belacqua.)
(June 2, 2020 at 6:14 pm)polymath257 Wrote:(June 2, 2020 at 3:58 pm)Belacqua Wrote: The form of the good.
You rejected the definition by begging the question. We've been through this.
No, I used your definition to show that there could not be a supernatural based on that definition. That was simple logic.
I asked if you had a different definition.
No, you asserted that anything we can observe is in the nature of the thing observed. That's your definition of what a nature is. It begs the question. For most people, the nature of a thing has limits. See my post to LadyforCamus above.