Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2024, 3:49 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(June 6, 2020 at 6:33 pm)Belacqua Wrote:
(June 6, 2020 at 11:32 am)polymath257 Wrote: Another: if you take 1 rock and forcefully smash it into another rock, it is quite possible to get 3 or more rocks out at the end. Once again, 1+1=2 is not a good descriptor of what is going on.


But there are any number of math questions that can't be tested empirically. Negative numbers, irrational numbers, imaginary numbers, infinite sets, numbers larger than the quantity of particles in the universe. 

By declaring a priori that only empirical things are true, and math is always and only a language to talk about that, you are again begging the question. Karl Popper and Roland Penrose disagree with you that numbers are only descriptors of physical states. 

Popper's Three Worlds system shows how non-physical entities also have a kind of existence, not testable through empirical means. They exist, but they have no extension or location.

Actually, negative numbers and complex (imaginary) numbers are very often used in our physical descriptions. For example, the interference properties of waves use negative numbers and quantum mechanics is a theory that uses complex numbers for the wave functions.

And, once again, math is not testable because *no* language is testable. it is either useful or not. And, in the case of math, a good part is, in fact, useful, but far from all of it.

You seem to be of the opinion that there is only one possible mathematics or logic. And that is quite far from being the case. In fact, after Godel, we know that *every* axiomatic system that is strong enough to talk about the natural numbers *has* to have undecidable questions. And, every such undecidable question splits math into at least two versions: one where the statement is true and the other where it is false.

I can even describe, if you wish, a number of those undecidable questions.

Popper was quite brilliant at one time, but he seems to have fallen off the back of the truck since he started thinking about consciousness. He is usually regarded as somewhat beyond his years now.

The three worlds mythology doesn't help at all.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me... - by polymath257 - June 7, 2020 at 9:42 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is life more satisfying as an atheist or religionist? FrustratedFool 96 4041 November 10, 2023 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  No soul? No free will and no responsibility then, yet the latter's essential... Duty 33 4130 August 26, 2020 at 4:35 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  His wish sounds familiar purplepurpose 1 923 November 16, 2017 at 4:55 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Ugh, how come I, an atheist, have the ability to ACT more "Christian" than...... maestroanth 7 1786 April 9, 2016 at 7:46 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Religious kids more likely to be cunts than atheist ones Napoléon 12 2788 November 6, 2015 at 5:50 pm
Last Post: paulpablo
  More atheist men than women? Catholic_Lady 203 29164 July 9, 2015 at 9:12 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Are Deists more like theists or Atheist? Twisted 37 9287 May 28, 2015 at 10:18 am
Last Post: comet
  Why do I find mysticism so appealing? JaceDeanLove 22 6748 December 24, 2014 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Mystic
  Do we need more Atheist books for kids? process613 43 7528 November 30, 2014 at 4:14 am
Last Post: fr0d0
  Panpsychism is not as crazy as it sounds. Mudhammam 64 16679 May 18, 2014 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Mudhammam



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)