(May 17, 2020 at 2:54 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:It would have helped if Mo had of bothered to describe the plague he was talking about(May 17, 2020 at 2:06 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Nice try, bro. You talk of the "modern sense" of plague as it was some obscure case of rarely seen diseases, the plague in its modern sense is the same plague that caused the deadliest pandemics in history, including the Black Death.
I guess you are the ones trying to make words as loose and meaningless as possible to rule out prophecies. This same tactic performed by your ancestors is what made you lose the words of Jesus entirely, to be left with the song of songs........
In the first prophecy you tried to shoehorn into accuracy, you claimed that Muhammad had to use language his followers understood. In the second, you insist that ONLY the modern, specific definition of plague is applicable (you did this when you dismissed the cholera epidemic).
You can’t have it both ways.
Boru
And what Klor is trying to argue is the idea everyone just knew what it meant because it had been around awhile . Of course this doesn't work nor does his accusation your saying the plague was obscure something you never said .
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM