[Remember]: how the Spanish infedels treated Muslims

[Deesse23]

Fyi: Vlad III is still considered to be a hero in Romania. I was there, i have seen it. I have talked to people.
Btw: There is one who did even more damage to the Ottomans, who suffered their biggest military defeat ever by his very hands. Someone who even supported Vlad (buz couldnt avoid him being murderd): Stefan cel mare/Stephen the Great. He just didnt put people on pikes, but definitely killed more Ottomans than Vlad.

But Atlass probably doesnt know this one either. "Vlad Tepes" is just another of his (he thinks so) "gotcha" phrases to stop any menaingful interaction. He is not interested in interaction, but in silencing opposition.

He wants to condem Vlad for fighting the Ottomans? Then he must condemn Arminius for fighting the romans. Vlad is a terrorist to the Ottomans and a freedom fighter for the Wallachians. Vlad put Ottomans on pikes, Arminius sacfrificed roman pows on altars to his gods.

Once again, Atlass has neither the will nor the intellectual curiosity to discuss these complex topics. These issues are only a mean to en end, and that end is to portray him and his likes as "good guys" and everyone else as "bad", and stifle any progress in meaningful ways to adress them.

Then, if your imagined story -that has no historic evidence- is true, then impaling pedophiles should be the sentence to use worldwide; according to your post I mean.

No historic evidence of the biggest defeat in ottoman history? The fact that you are ignorant of stuff does not mean stuff didnt happen.

To give you another hint: The battle of Vaslui was so much imagined, and Stephen so much less feared and respected than Vlad (his cousin, actually), that you can see Stephens sword in the Topkapi Palace in Istanbul today. If you desire to get rid of your ignorance that is.

Still imagined? Or is it your ignorance again?

Your insane ramblings about pehophiles is....just that and not worth any of my time commenting.

Oh, and by the way, i researched and found out that Stephen also impaled muslims once: Muslim emissaries to be precise.

---

Fyi: Vlad III is still considered to be a hero in Romania. I was there, i have seen it. I have talked to people.
Btw: There is one who did even more damage to the Ottomans, who suffered their biggest military defeat ever by his very hands. Someone who even supported Vlad (buz couldnt avoid him being murderd): Stefan cel mare/Stephen the Great. He just didnt put people on pikes, but definitely killed more Ottomans than Vlad.

But Atlass probably doesnt know this one either. "Vlad Tepes" is just another of his (he thinks so) "gotcha" phrases to stop any menaingful interaction. He is not interested in interaction, but in silencing opposition.

He wants to condem Vlad for fighting the Ottomans? Then he must condemn Arminius for fighting the romans. Vlad is a terrorist to the Ottomans and a freedom fighter for the Wallachians. Vlad put Ottomans on pikes, Arminius sacfrificed roman pows on altars to his gods.

Once again, Atlass has neither the will nor the intellectual curiosity to discuss these complex topics. These issues are only a mean to en end, and that end is to portray him and his likes as "good guys" and everyone else as "bad", and stifle any progress in meaningful ways to adress them.

One could even make the point that Tepes was cleverer than Hermann the German. Arminius used Roman tactics to defeat the Romans, whereas Vlad was a true original.

Boru

I would say arminius used his knowledge of roman tactics to defeat the romans, namely his conclusion that you cant defeat the Romans in a pitched battle on an open field. He led them into a trap, much like Stephen at Vaslui.

Another thing about Vlad and his cousin Stephen is very intriguing (and i am not putting vlaue son anything, just reporting interesting facts): Both used scorched earth tactics and guerilla warfare. Both were quite successful and asked the kingdom of Hungary and the Holy Roman Empire for help, but got noe of it. One can only wonder what may hhave happened (or not) on the balcans if tens of thousands of knights would have been sent by the Emperor. Its also telling in and of itself how little the hungarian king or german emperor cared abou those balkanese orthodox christians and their problems with invading Ottomans. Amost a replay of what happened when the crusaders Pushed Asia Minor, Antioch and Edessa and the rest of the Muslim world was going *meh*. 

Almost as if the religious actually dont care that much about fellow believers (when from another realm and another denomination) rahter than about their own power struggles.

---

Then, if your imagined story -that has no historic evidence- is true, then impaling pedophiles should be the sentence to use worldwide; according to your post I mean.

You are operating under the wrong assumption that everyone is an unicivilized savage like you who loves to impose permanent physcial harm or death penalties for minor (if any at all) offenses.

You are also operating under the wrong assumption that one must have an opinion when reporting facts. The fact that i report certain facts does not mean i support what happened. We know you are operating under exactly that modus operandi. Others however arent. See above.
IOW: You arent collecting facts and forming opinions based on those facts. You have an opinion and then selectively reports facts to support your position. Thats why you assume everyone else does too. That why you assumed me talking about impalers means i support impalement. This train of thought is silly to the point of being ridiculous, but hey, this is not the first time we are making this experoience with you. This is very ....unhelpful to figure out what is true and not. It is useful to confirm your biases....and thats why you are doing so, correct?

Not everyone is as ignorant and cruel like you. Try to think about that fact next time you are trying to reply to anything from anyone.