(April 5, 2021 at 10:17 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote:(April 5, 2021 at 5:37 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Maybe because he's on video threatening to assault the officers? Did we forget about that already?
-and that's why the guy who stood on his neck for nine minutes isn't guilty of murder.
Do you practice this to hear yourself before you type it?
Nope, and I literally just complimented the prosecution's case yesterday by saying that Zimmerman's testimony was pretty damning.
I don't know why you see the need to continue to defend lying under oath. You lie under oath, you lose credibility. This is not hard to understand. Doesn't mean he's not guilty of murder. It just means I, as a juror, take everything he said about MMA techniques and I throw it all out of the window as if I had never heard it. If they want to get an MMA expert to testify, get one that doesn't have such a high investment in the case.