RE: Daily conspiracy
November 5, 2022 at 7:26 am
(This post was last modified: November 5, 2022 at 7:50 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Argument from motivation? The author you provided literally said there was no evidence that the government has any censorious motives. They gave their opinion on how the government thinks, and I literally just pointed that out. This author trusts the government. I don't see how me pointing out the authors opinion is me committing any type of fallacy.So pointing out your argument from motivation somehow refutes that it's an argument from motivation?
And you say the authors arguments were bad
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM