(October 3, 2021 at 6:01 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote:Ah he's back to the tired if we reject ID we must endorse solipsism nonsense(October 3, 2021 at 4:13 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: And what do you suggest, that we neglect the appearances that reach our senses?Well, that presents you with a problem. If you were walking on a beach and found a watch lying in the sand, would you conclude it was designed?
The problem of other minds is very useful here to think about. The appearance of other people is not the same as evidence for people. Should we endorse solipsism, then?
It is relevant actually. If you are trying to reject theism based on observations of bone cancer or other instances of evil, then you have to prove that evil is prevalent under the assumption of theism.
Attaboyyy. I completely agree.
No you couldn't, because you think every single grain of sand on the beach was also designed.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM