RE: Atheism and the existence of peanut butter
October 4, 2021 at 9:55 pm
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2021 at 9:56 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
(October 4, 2021 at 9:15 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:Weird who decides what's more impressive. I mean the fish is pretty but I highly doubt it could wipe out most of Europe's population. Impressive doesn't mean pretty. Termites are ugly as hell but try telling me their mounds aren't impressive(October 4, 2021 at 5:19 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Yersinia pestis's design is not less impressive than the pretty fish.
It may be impressive, but it is not intelligent or it would be very cruel.
(October 4, 2021 at 5:19 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: But because atheists suddenly become blind when it comes to the apparent design of various life forms, presenting good-looking animals is a good way to bring them back to their senses.
This shows again how you don't know anything about what you are talking about. Atheists are very well aware of the design of nature and life. It doesn't mean that if atheists don't believe in the intelligent design that they don't see the design. Nature is designed by forces that influence it, like sand dunes are designed by winds, and life is designed by natural selection.
To educate yourself read the book "The Blind Watchmaker" by Richard Dawkins.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM