Calculus, Logic, Music and the Human Brain

[Statler Waldorf]

---

Oh you're sorry alright...lol.

"Creation of information
Further information: Physical information, Biosemiotics
Another new, and increasingly common, objection of creationists to evolution is that evolutionary mechanisms such as mutation cannot generate new information. Creationists such as William A. Dembski, Werner Gitt, and Lee Spetner have attempted to use information theory to dispute evolution. Dembski has argued that life demonstrates specified complexity, and that evolution without an intelligent agent cannot account for the generation of information that would be required to produce specified complexity. The Christian apologetics site Answers in Genesis, for example, makes frequent appeals to concepts from information theory in its objections to evolution and affirmations of the Genesis account of Creation; "[I]t should be clear that a rigorous application of the science of information is devastating to materialistic philosophy in the guise of evolution, and strongly supportive of Genesis creation."[138]
These claims have been widely rejected by the scientific community; new information is regularly generated in evolution, whenever a novel mutation or gene duplication arises. Dramatic examples of entirely new, unique traits arising through mutation have been observed in recent years, such as the evolution of nylon-eating bacteria, which developed new enzymes to efficiently digest a material that never existed before the modern era.[139][140] In fact, when an organism is considered together with the environment it evolved in, there is no need to account for the creation of information. The information in the genome forms a record of how it was possible to survive in a particular environment. It is not created, but rather gathered from the environment through research—by trial and error, as mutating organisms either reproduce or fail.[141]
A related argument against evolution is that most mutations are harmful.[142] However, the vast majority of mutations are neutral, and the minority of mutations which are beneficial or harmful are often situational; a mutation that is harmful in one environment may be helpful in another.[143]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objections_...nformation

You could have googled that yourself and you would have actually learned something, troll. Don't even have to come out of pocket for an actual education. I dont want to hear anything else about loss of information (or evolution not being observed) until you've explained nylon eating bacteria...with a verse from the bible.

Start here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nylon-eating_bacteria

---

Wikipedia? Surprise, surprise. I guess I am allowed to use my sources then.

Nylon eating moth argument refuted….

http://creation.com/refutation-of-new-sc...-selection

New genetic information argument refuted…

http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j19_1..._61-64.pdf

More new genetic information arguments refuted….

http://creation.com/new-genetic-information

Beneficial mutations argument refuted…

http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-2...beneficial

Anything else you want refuted?