Posts: 506
Threads: 16
Joined: May 20, 2010
Reputation:
5
More Ron Bashing
January 27, 2012 at 2:29 pm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/r...story.html
It's the same tired old crap. Same newsletter shit, cause that is ALL they have on him, which inst even anything.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: More Ron Bashing
January 27, 2012 at 2:44 pm
Well.... this
Quote:“It was his newsletter, and it was under his name, so he always got to see the final product. . . . He would proof it,’’ said Renae Hathway, a former secretary in Paul’s company and a supporter of the Texas congressman.
makes him out to be a fucking liar....not that being a liar is anything new to any of them.
Listen, I don't give a shit. I can't imagine the circumstances under which I would ever vote for any fascist republican scumbag. It is YOU he is lying to. If you don't care, not my problem.
He's sinking in the polls faster than a stone anyway.
Posts: 506
Threads: 16
Joined: May 20, 2010
Reputation:
5
RE: More Ron Bashing
January 27, 2012 at 3:45 pm
(This post was last modified: January 27, 2012 at 3:46 pm by paintpooper.)
Well I'm sorry you use polls as scientific data. They mean nothing.
Oh wow ONE LADY says he proof read it, one secretary... yeah way to believe everything you hear. One witness is enough for 100% conclusive proof eh?
Where do you get fascistic from, you are so wrong. You are the brainwashed liberal.
Also these newsletters are irrelevant. If the war on drugs stopped that would help African Americans more then any other policy any candidate has. It's actions that matters not words.
Proof to me he is s fascist, and racist, you can't. You are the ones with no evidence. Ok I say "Obama told me he likes men" does that make it a fact. Hahaha you guys are the gullible ones.
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: More Ron Bashing
January 27, 2012 at 3:59 pm
Ron Paul is running for president, so determing if he is a racist, i.e. the validity of those newsletters, is not irrelevant to most people. It is irrelevant to me though, because i wouldn't vote for him regardless.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: More Ron Bashing
January 27, 2012 at 4:00 pm
Look, you can apologize and make excuses for the fucktard all you like. You sound like G-C making excuses for his god. Like I said, he's a pimple on the ass of history and I'd never consider voting for any republican anyway.
Fuck every last one of them.
Posts: 506
Threads: 16
Joined: May 20, 2010
Reputation:
5
RE: More Ron Bashing
January 27, 2012 at 4:07 pm
(This post was last modified: January 27, 2012 at 4:10 pm by paintpooper.)
It is irrelevant because it is not factual so it is not a good determination of ones racial beliefs. You can not determine the personal beliefs of a man by something published in a newsletter. You need to base facts off peoples actions.
Someone who is racist wants to dis-enfranchise a certain minority of a population due to skin color. The current political/judicial structure is hurting minorities, so I could call all current politicians racist due to their support or continuation of programs that disproportionally persecute people of color. This is not based on some arbitrary writing in a newsletter, this is based on the current facts and trends of minority peoples. These are the facts.
(January 27, 2012 at 4:00 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Look, you can apologize and make excuses for the fucktard all you like. You sound like G-C making excuses for his god. Like I said, he's a pimple on the ass of history and I'd never consider voting for any republican anyway.
Fuck every last one of them.
Your stubbornness is clouding the truth. Your making broad generalizations about people and a party. The Republican party is a fluid organization with always changing ideas. Ron's idea's are hardly current mainstream republican ideas.
You have to be able to change and adapt to different ideas and ways of thinking.
Posts: 2966
Threads: 124
Joined: May 12, 2011
Reputation:
30
RE: More Ron Bashing
January 27, 2012 at 4:16 pm
(This post was last modified: January 27, 2012 at 4:20 pm by 5thHorseman.)
im voting Rick Santorum.
Fuck Ron Paul.
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: More Ron Bashing
January 27, 2012 at 4:17 pm
OK, let's say he isn't a racist. Then why did he allow someone to publish a newsletter using his name without him even knowing what was in it? This smacks of incompetence at least. I guarantee if anyone asked to publish something under my name purporting to come from me, I would definitely read it before it went out. I find it very hard to believe that this newsletter was published under his name without him knowing what was in it. At any rate, he should have known what was being said in these newsletters being distributed for a period of several years. I could see if it was a one-off occurrence where an editor left a racist comment in one issue by mistake, but this was deliberately going on for years. If Ron Paul wins the presidency, is he going to have a press secretary sending out statements and press releases without personally directing him to or even checking them first?
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Posts: 506
Threads: 16
Joined: May 20, 2010
Reputation:
5
RE: More Ron Bashing
January 27, 2012 at 4:20 pm
(This post was last modified: January 27, 2012 at 4:24 pm by paintpooper.)
(January 27, 2012 at 4:17 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: OK, let's say he isn't a racist. Then why did he allow someone to publish a newsletter using his name without him even knowing what was in it? This smacks of incompetence at least. I guarantee if anyone asked to publish something under my name purporting to come from me, I would definitely read it before it went out. I find it very hard to believe that this newsletter was published under his name without him knowing what was in it. At any rate, he should have known what was being said in these newsletters being distributed for a period of several years. I could see if it was a one-off occurrence where an editor left a racist comment in one issue by mistake, but this was deliberately going on for years. If Ron Paul wins the presidency, is he going to have a press secretary sending out statements and press releases without personally directing him to or even checking them first?
Still its 20 year old newsletter. Fucking Perry used to be a democrat you don't see them bitching about that. And Romney did "socialized" healthcare and they still don't care. So give me a break.
You are grasping here.... Ok he was incompetent 20 years ago.. sorry he didn't have better control on a newsletter with his name on it. Again actions speak louder then words. No one is 100% perfect in life, but this is such a small issue, and it seems like the only one people can keep bringing up, so IMO thats pretty good if this is the only kinda dirt they can dig up on him.
Still remember to compare all this to our current leaders. I will shut down Guantanamo. (Still going) I will stop the wars. (He started more wars).
Posts: 2966
Threads: 124
Joined: May 12, 2011
Reputation:
30
RE: More Ron Bashing
January 27, 2012 at 4:23 pm
He's imcompetent now PP. He's a deluded utopian.
You honestly think de-regulating is good?
You think ridding America of the Dept' of Education is good?
You think repealing Civil Rights Act is good?
His economic ideas would create a greater gulf in wage inequality.
|