Christianity and the 10 Commandments

[Phil]

I did not ignore it I read it but simply did not respond

No, you ignored it since it easily shows Humphreys "curvature" to be false or you wouldn't be insisting Humphreys thesis is correct nor would you still be calling it a theory.

And you ignored everything I said in that post except the first sentence.

No I didn't ignore it. First off it isn't my job to educate you in cosmology but if you would like to pay me I will tutor you via email. Second, why should I waste my time when you will obviously ignore it? Third, you already ignored when I gave you an example showing that the flatness really is obvious with any thought. Fourth, if you were really interested in any aspects of cosmology, you would be reading books on the subject not spouting fallacious nonsense.

The one thing I am concerned with is that once again you are showing an extreme lack of respect by ignoring what I wrote to you about my hostility and disrespect towards you. To be honest, it looks like you can expect to continue with disrespect, hostility and derision.

[chi pan]

I did not ignore it I read it but simply did not respond

No, you ignored it since it easily shows Humphreys "curvature" to be false or you wouldn't be insisting Humphreys thesis is correct nor would you still be calling it a theory.

And you ignored everything I said in that post except the first sentence.

No I didn't ignore it. First off it isn't my job to educate you in cosmology but if you would like to pay me I will tutor you via email. Second, why should I waste my time when you will obviously ignore it? Third, you already ignored when I gave you an example showing that the flatness really is obvious with any thought. Fourth, if you were really interested in any aspects of cosmology, you would be reading books on the subject not spouting fallacious nonsense.

The one thing I am concerned with is that once again you are showing an extreme lack of respect by ignoring what I wrote to you about my hostility and disrespect towards you. To be honest, it looks like you can expect to continue with disrespect, hostility and derision.

Ok first I did not ignore it. And second, you did not give me an example how flatness is obvious, you simple said they have measured it which I posed the question how and you ignored that. Third, I proved I did not ignore it by reciting it off memory in the post you ignored all but the first sentence in. You ignored my questions and I doubt you intend to answer them.

[Phil]

Ok first I did not ignore it. And second, you did not give me an example how flatness is obvious, you simple said they have measured it which I posed the question how and you ignored that.

Reread the fucking post where I first mentioned the flatness and you will see an example of how I said it is intuitive and obvious. Then come back an apologize for fucking disrespecting me and calling me a liar. Until then, go fuck yourself asshole.

[chi pan]

Ok first I did not ignore it. And second, you did not give me an example how flatness is obvious, you simple said they have measured it which I posed the question how and you ignored that.

Reread the fucking post where I first mentioned the flatness and you will see an example of how I said it is intuitive and obvious. Then come back an apologize for fucking disrespecting me and calling me a liar. Until then, go fuck yourself asshole.

You did say that but you also said it is shown to be flat by an accuracy of .001% roughly. This implies measurement or how could you get that number?

---

And I also did not call you a liar. I simply asked a couple questions and you flip out.

---

And saying it is initiative and obvious is not giving an example it is simply making a statement.

[chi pan]

And one more thing. Please explain if this .001% is the amount of accuracy or the amount of error. If it is the accuracy, it is not very accurate. I assumed you meant error because saying the probability is .001%, is not at all accurate. After that please explain where that number comes from. And I correct my typo from my previous post. It's intuitive.

[Zen Badger]

As to Dr Humphreys work

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Humphreys

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Russell_Humphreys

Apparently the crux of Humphreys hypothesis is that the Earth is in the event horizon of a black hole, hence the time dilation.......



Let me elaborate on that....

[Phil]

Ok first I did not ignore it. And second, you did not give me an example how flatness is obvious, you simple said they have measured it which I posed the question how and you ignored that.

Reread the fucking post where I first mentioned the flatness and you will see an example of how I said it is intuitive and obvious. Then come back an apologize for fucking disrespecting me and calling me a liar. Until then, go fuck yourself asshole.

You did say that but you also said it is shown to be flat by an accuracy of .001% roughly. This implies measurement or how could you get that number?

---

And I also did not call you a liar. I simply asked a couple questions and you flip out.

---

And saying it is initiative and obvious is not giving an example it is simply making a statement.

No apology for disrespecting me AND calling me a liar by claiming I didn't supply an example. Can't say I'm surprised by this. Go fuck yourself, you will never get anything but hostility, disrespect and derision from me now. Hope you're fucking happy. You do realize that if there were a Jesus, your actions in this thread make him vomit.

---

As to Dr Humphreys work

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Humphreys

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Russell_Humphreys

Apparently the crux of Humphreys hypothesis is that the Earth is in the event horizon of a black hole, hence the time dilation.......



Let me elaborate on that....

Quick, call Dr. Neil Degrasse Tyson since he wrote the book [i]Death By Black Hole.

[KichigaiNeko]

---

As to Dr Humphreys work

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Humphreys

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Russell_Humphreys

Apparently the crux of Humphreys hypothesis is that the Earth is in the event horizon of a black hole, hence the time dilation.......



Let me elaborate on that....

---

Quick, call Dr. Neil Degrasse Tyson since he wrote the book Death By Black Hole.

Plagerism??

[chi pan]

Ok first I did not ignore it. And second, you did not give me an example how flatness is obvious, you simple said they have measured it which I posed the question how and you ignored that.

Reread the fucking post where I first mentioned the flatness and you will see an example of how I said it is intuitive and obvious. Then come back an apologize for fucking disrespecting me and calling me a liar. Until then, go fuck yourself asshole.

You did say that but you also said it is shown to be flat by an accuracy of .001% roughly. This implies measurement or how could you get that number?

---

And I also did not call you a liar. I simply asked a couple questions and you flip out.

---

And saying it is initiative and obvious is not giving an example it is simply making a statement.

No apology for disrespecting me AND calling me a liar by claiming I didn't supply an example. Can't say I'm surprised by this. Go fuck yourself, you will never get anything but hostility, disrespect and derision from me now. Hope you're fucking happy. You do realize that if there were a Jesus, your actions in this thread make him vomit.

---

You obviously don't listen. I did not call you a liar, you did not give an example you just said "it's intuitive and obvious" which is not an example. You did not post a link or anything. You pull numbers from nowhere and don't explain how you got them. Whatever be mad all you want idc.

[The Grand Nudger]

Actually Chip, he said "it's intuitive and obvious"...and then....the very next line...he gave an example. Maybe your browser is screwing with you, deleting only that line of his post?