Posts: 433
Threads: 2
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
5
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 16, 2014 at 1:38 pm
(September 16, 2014 at 1:32 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: how do you know we can't understand God?
Well, for one, there's this guy/girl who calls himself "C4RM5" who said the following:
(September 16, 2014 at 1:32 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: But I have already said God is to vast for me to comprehend. Of course, the fact that in literally the previous sentence he/she says this:
(September 16, 2014 at 1:32 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: He is immanent because he sent his son who I believe is God on earth, this helps me to understand what God is. Makes me think he/she doesn't know what he/she's talking about. Either that or it's a language issue.
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
Posts: 912
Threads: 5
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
4
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 16, 2014 at 1:40 pm
(September 16, 2014 at 1:38 pm)One Above All Wrote: (September 16, 2014 at 1:32 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: how do you know we can't understand God?
Well, for one, there's this guy/girl who calls himself "C4RM5" who said the following:
(September 16, 2014 at 1:32 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: ù
But I have already said God is to vast for me to comprehend. Of course, the fact that in literally the previous sentence he/she says this:
(September 16, 2014 at 1:32 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: He is immanent because he sent his son who I believe is God on earth, this helps me to understand what God is. Makes me think he/she doesn't know what he/she's talking about. Either that or it's a language issue. What I should of added was that Jesus gives me a basic understanding of God.
Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 16, 2014 at 1:47 pm
(September 16, 2014 at 1:40 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: (September 16, 2014 at 1:38 pm)One Above All Wrote: Well, for one, there's this guy/girl who calls himself "C4RM5" who said the following:
Of course, the fact that in literally the previous sentence he/she says this:
Makes me think he/she doesn't know what he/she's talking about. Either that or it's a language issue. What I should of added was that Jesus gives me a basic understanding of God.
So Jesus gave you a basic understanding of himself.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 912
Threads: 5
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
4
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 16, 2014 at 1:48 pm
(September 16, 2014 at 1:47 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: (September 16, 2014 at 1:40 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: What I should of added was that Jesus gives me a basic understanding of God.
So Jesus gave you a basic understanding of himself. Yes there is so much more to God.
Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
104
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 16, 2014 at 1:56 pm
(September 16, 2014 at 1:48 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: (September 16, 2014 at 1:47 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: So Jesus gave you a basic understanding of himself. Yes there is so much more to God.
Posts: 912
Threads: 5
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
4
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 16, 2014 at 2:00 pm
(September 16, 2014 at 1:56 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: (September 16, 2014 at 1:48 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: Yes there is so much more to God.
That is a good picture, quite funny picture most of it is true.
Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 16, 2014 at 2:05 pm
(September 16, 2014 at 2:00 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: (September 16, 2014 at 1:56 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: That is a good picture, quite funny picture most of it is true.
It's bizarre and unintelligible.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 433
Threads: 2
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
5
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 16, 2014 at 2:09 pm
(September 16, 2014 at 1:40 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: What I should of added was that Jesus gives me a basic understanding of God.
"Basic understanding" is still comprehension, which you said was impossible. Care to try again?
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
Posts: 912
Threads: 5
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
4
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 16, 2014 at 2:09 pm
(September 16, 2014 at 2:05 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: (September 16, 2014 at 2:00 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: That is a good picture, quite funny picture most of it is true.
It's bizarre and unintelligible.
Most of it is true.
Posts: 433
Threads: 2
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
5
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 16, 2014 at 2:28 pm
(September 16, 2014 at 2:09 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: (September 16, 2014 at 2:05 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: It's bizarre and unintelligible.
Most of it is true.
Do you understand what "unintelligible" means?
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
|