Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 28, 2024, 8:51 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pat Robertson says it's ok to ignore parts of the Bible.
RE: Pat Robertson says it's ok to ignore parts of the Bible.
(July 14, 2012 at 11:16 pm)cratehorus Wrote:
(July 14, 2012 at 11:12 pm)Drich Wrote: Do You still not undstand the basics of Christianity?
Or are you just trying desperatly to get the last word in? If you want the last word then you may have it. If you still having trouble with the Most basic of all Christian distinctives then simply ask for me to explain it.

For if their were any differences between OT Judaism and NT Christianity we would be OT Jews.

nobody understands the basics of christianity....except for maybe these OT Jews I keep hearing about.....

Christianity is based on the premise that one can not live a sin free life. There were some who believe that they could live a sin free life if they strictly followed the OT laws. But, Christ in Mt 5 completed the law and made it impossiable for anyone to find righteousness through the Law. Then Christianity provides attonement for those who fail to reach the standard of the Law through the blood sacerfice of Christ. Forever Seperating Righteousness from the Law.

Meaning we no longer have to be perfect/strictly adhear to the law to goto Heaven.
Reply
RE: Pat Robertson says it's ok to ignore parts of the Bible.
I've always seen the issue of slavery in the Bible as being much akin to the indentured servitude in early America only more extreme....not going to go into the OT right now because frankly I don't want to take the time on an issue that is not pressing in the current age. What the Americans and other Western societies did to the African people was not endorsed on the issue of slavery in the Bible as far as I can recollect.

Ephesians 6:9

"And masters, treat your slaves in the same way. Do not threaten them, since you know that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and there is no favoritism with him."

Yes Paul still does not speak against slavery, but this quote just shows you how little people who claimed to live by the Bible actually read their copies. Same can be said presently for Christians, especially American Christians.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Reply
RE: Pat Robertson says it's ok to ignore parts of the Bible.
(July 15, 2012 at 12:08 am)Polaris Wrote: I've always seen the issue of slavery in the Bible as being much akin to the indentured servitude in early America only more extreme....not going to go into the OT right now because frankly I don't want to take the time on an issue that is not pressing in the current age.

Oh, excuse me, you seem to have dropped that Special Pleading there, here, you can have it back....

Quote: What the Americans and other Western societies did to the African people was not endorsed on the issue of slavery in the Bible as far as I can recollect.


Except by your fairy tale GOD right up there with the ten commandments.

(July 14, 2012 at 11:58 pm)Drich Wrote:
(July 14, 2012 at 11:16 pm)cratehorus Wrote: nobody understands the basics of christianity....except for maybe these OT Jews I keep hearing about.....

Christianity is based on the BULLSHIT premise that one can not live a sin free life.

"Sin" doesn't mean anything. It is simply an iron age construct.


Quote:There were some who believe that they could live a sin free life if they strictly followed the OT laws. But, Christ in Mt 5 completed the law and made it impossiable for anyone to find righteousness through the Law.

Incoherent babble. "Impossible" has no "a" in it.


Quote:Then Christianity provides attonement for those who fail to reach the standard of the Law through the blood sacerfice of Christ. Forever Seperating Righteousness from the Law.

[Image: 81366568.gif]

Quote:Meaning we no longer have to be perfect/strictly adhear to the law to goto Heaven.

In other words, your fairy tale jeebus usurped and undermined the laws of your monster gawd that you had previously maintained were absolutely non-negotiable.

[Image: firework-self-pwn.gif]

Nice self-pwn there, asswipe.

(July 15, 2012 at 12:08 am)Polaris Wrote: . What the Americans and other Western societies did to the African people was not endorsed on the issue of slavery in the Bible as far as I can recollect.


Exo 21:7
7 “If a man sells his daughter as a servant, she is not to go free as male servants do.
Hurr Durr
Reply
RE: Pat Robertson says it's ok to ignore parts of the Bible.
(July 15, 2012 at 12:40 am)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: [Image: 81366568.gif]

Dafuq?
Reply
RE: Pat Robertson says it's ok to ignore parts of the Bible.
(July 15, 2012 at 12:56 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(July 15, 2012 at 12:40 am)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: [Image: 81366568.gif]

Dafuq?

Indeed.

[Image: What--1.gif]
Reply
RE: Pat Robertson says it's ok to ignore parts of the Bible.
At the risk of asking a question that's already been asked:

If slavery wasn't such a big deal in OT times, why did God spend so much effort removing the Hebrews from slavery in Egypt? Or was it just bad for Hebrews to be slaves, but perfectly okay for anyone not Hebrew to be one?

Or is the original premise - that the Judeo/Christian god is a cunt (meaning that his followers are, since "he" doesn't actually exist) - the only logical answer?
Reply
RE: Pat Robertson says it's ok to ignore parts of the Bible.
(July 16, 2012 at 7:43 pm)Colanth Wrote: At the risk of asking a question that's already been asked:

If slavery wasn't such a big deal in OT times, why did God spend so much effort removing the Hebrews from slavery in Egypt? Or was it just bad for Hebrews to be slaves, but perfectly okay for anyone not Hebrew to be one?

Or is the original premise - that the Judeo/Christian god is a cunt (meaning that his followers are, since "he" doesn't actually exist) - the only logical answer?

It's not been asked. Why didn't you speak up sooner. Clap
I have studied the Bible and the theology behind Christianity for many years. I have been to many churches. I have walked the depth and the breadth of the religion and, as a result of this, I have a lot of bullshit to scrape off the bottom of my shoes. ~Ziploc Surprise

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? Whateverist 143 49134 March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  The Bible Says So YahwehIsTheWay 24 4310 December 7, 2018 at 5:05 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  World ending on April 23rd, says false prophet Divinity 41 9911 April 27, 2018 at 1:19 pm
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Pope says in interview that there is no hell. downbeatplumb 56 11776 April 16, 2018 at 8:53 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Tell All Book Says Pat Robertson Full of Shit Minimalist 12 3832 September 29, 2017 at 3:51 pm
Last Post: Atheist73
  Who Says Godscreated 153 40074 September 15, 2017 at 2:28 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  What the bible says Hell is like sinnerdaniel94 843 153238 September 11, 2016 at 6:08 pm
Last Post: Arkilogue
  Billy Graham's Daughter says transgender people responsible for 9/11 Aroura 23 5681 May 15, 2016 at 7:02 am
Last Post: abaris
Wink The Third Eagle of the Apocalypse says...the end is nigh! Aegon 12 5816 January 18, 2016 at 7:38 am
Last Post: ignoramus
Thumbs Down Bible says convert or kill the nonbelievers too. Thumbs down for Christianity... IanHulett 68 21124 January 5, 2016 at 11:49 am
Last Post: Drich



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)