Posts: 2610
Threads: 22
Joined: May 18, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Pat Robertson says it's ok to ignore parts of the Bible.
July 15, 2012 at 12:08 am
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2012 at 12:08 am by Polaris.)
I've always seen the issue of slavery in the Bible as being much akin to the indentured servitude in early America only more extreme....not going to go into the OT right now because frankly I don't want to take the time on an issue that is not pressing in the current age. What the Americans and other Western societies did to the African people was not endorsed on the issue of slavery in the Bible as far as I can recollect.
Ephesians 6:9
"And masters, treat your slaves in the same way. Do not threaten them, since you know that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and there is no favoritism with him."
Yes Paul still does not speak against slavery, but this quote just shows you how little people who claimed to live by the Bible actually read their copies. Same can be said presently for Christians, especially American Christians.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Posts: 67
Threads: 0
Joined: June 15, 2012
Reputation:
0
RE: Pat Robertson says it's ok to ignore parts of the Bible.
July 16, 2012 at 7:43 pm
At the risk of asking a question that's already been asked:
If slavery wasn't such a big deal in OT times, why did God spend so much effort removing the Hebrews from slavery in Egypt? Or was it just bad for Hebrews to be slaves, but perfectly okay for anyone not Hebrew to be one?
Or is the original premise - that the Judeo/Christian god is a cunt (meaning that his followers are, since "he" doesn't actually exist) - the only logical answer?
Posts: 833
Threads: 155
Joined: October 27, 2011
Reputation:
11
RE: Pat Robertson says it's ok to ignore parts of the Bible.
July 16, 2012 at 9:10 pm
(July 16, 2012 at 7:43 pm)Colanth Wrote: At the risk of asking a question that's already been asked:
If slavery wasn't such a big deal in OT times, why did God spend so much effort removing the Hebrews from slavery in Egypt? Or was it just bad for Hebrews to be slaves, but perfectly okay for anyone not Hebrew to be one?
Or is the original premise - that the Judeo/Christian god is a cunt (meaning that his followers are, since "he" doesn't actually exist) - the only logical answer?
It's not been asked. Why didn't you speak up sooner.
I have studied the Bible and the theology behind Christianity for many years. I have been to many churches. I have walked the depth and the breadth of the religion and, as a result of this, I have a lot of bullshit to scrape off the bottom of my shoes. ~Ziploc Surprise