Acountability, never got a good answer to this.

[fr0d0]

You still haven't explained, Raphael, how your interpretation of the original authors ends up saying the opposite of what they say. It seems like your comprehension abilities are dysfunctional.

[Reforged]

You still haven't explained, Raphael, how your interpretation of the original authors ends up saying the opposite of what they say. It seems like your comprehension abilities are dysfunctional.

Are you literally retarded or something? I don't have an "interpretation", I leave interpretations to the people who buy into that crap.
I just stated a long list of events that supposedly happened according to the book you go by. If they're not true then theres no reason to believe anything the Bible says, if they are true then theres no way you can tell me Gods just. The definition of just is the opposite of all of those actions. I lay all of this before you and *thats* your response? Brilliant.

Don't blame me, blame the people who wrote it. While you're at it ask them why they didn't hang onto a shred of tangible evidence aside from their childish scrawling if it isn't all bullshit.

[Cato]

You still haven't explained, Raphael, how your interpretation of the original authors ends up saying the opposite of what they say. It seems like your comprehension abilities are dysfunctional.

Are you intentionally being difficult, or can you simply not spell his name right? It's RaphIel, not Raphael. Your spelling is much more common; however, let's get shit right.

Understanding that the only piece of evidence there is for the god of the Bible is the Bible, outside of a warm feeling in the bosom when considering serendiptious coincidence, shouldn't God me more clear? Why do I have to learn three extra languages to understand the 'true' meaning of God's word? Even if I was fluent in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic, there is still argument about meaning.

I have a better idea. Why don't you idiots take however long it takes to get your story straight and then come back with a convincing argument. You do recognize that there are over 30,000 different denominations of Christianity, right? In the meantime, we'll endeavor to make the world a better place to live.

[fr0d0]

Well it seems after demands for me to stop the insults, people can't help but insult me. That's funny

@ Raffia

Yes dude, your interpretation. Well, maybe I'd agree with you that such a departure from the subject shouldn't be credited so generously. Shall we call your version fantastic misreading? Maybe that's more accurate.

You seem to be more fundamentalist than any nutty Christian, sticking to your warped perspective. I dismiss your delusional ramblings as much as I do theirs.

Now if you have nothing more to add...


Hey Cato

If you wish to discuss a subject, you better be prepared to address that subject. Christianity claims nothing more that what the bible states. Either man up to that or put your blindfold back on.

The message is very simple and clear. Children can understand it.

[Reforged]

Well it seems after demands for me to stop the insults, people can't help but insult me. That's funny

@ Raffia

Yes dude, your interpretation. Well, maybe I'd agree with you that such a departure from the subject shouldn't be credited so generously. Shall we call your version fantastic misreading? Maybe that's more accurate.

You seem to be more fundamentalist than any nutty Christian, sticking to your warped perspective. I dismiss your delusional ramblings as much as I do theirs.

Now if you have nothing more to add...

I'm sorry, are you claiming the events I listed aren't in the Bible as actually having of occurred? Because thats what I'm getting from "misreading", "interpretation" and "delusional". If thats what you're saying please be very clear about it. I'd hate anyone to miss it.
Go on, retreat again. I fucking dare you.

[fr0d0]

Again with the threats. You like those huh?

I'm claiming a literal interpretation as opposed to your fabrication, Yes Raph. Use your head dude. Like creationists, you claim literal truths by extracting your own meaning from the text. Can you honestly be telling me that you are of inferior intellect to these ignorant goat herders? That appears to be exactly what you're saying. Man you got pwnd!

[Reforged]

Again with the threats. You like those huh?

I'm claiming a literal interpretation as opposed to your fabrication, Yes Raph. Use your head dude. Like creationists, you claim literal truths by extracting your own meaning from the text. Can you honestly be telling me that you are of inferior intellect to these ignorant goat herders? That appears to be exactly what you're saying. Man you got pwnd!

Threat? Nah. More like a reminder of what happened last time. If you need more of a reminder just look at my signature. Should send memories flooding back.

So, sorry. You agree all the events I listed * literally* happened. Whether I picked them or not isn't the issue. You believe they *literally* happened.
Alright, tell me what interpretation you get from God allowing Abraham to fuck his own daughters. Or even better, tell me about the priest and his concubine. Where he allowed dozens of men to rape, torture and murder her in place of him. Whats your spin on things there?
Also, by that logic its only your interpretation that God is just. So we're just looking at your word here and from where I'm sitting... your word isn't good enough.

Pwned? Don't try to retreat with that, no-one heres stupid enough to buy it. I'm not the one believing in this bullshit. I'm just getting started with you.

---

Whats wrong fr0d0? Cato got your tongue? Or is it just an inability to answer a perfectly simple question... just like the last time I handed your ass to you. Well I *say* the last time. Theres so many last times I should keep some kind of diary of them to use as a reference. :-)

[fr0d0]

You keep on about that last time like I didn''t thoroughly answer your adolescent screaming. Granted your lack of basic reading skills is widely displayed, so I hold no malice.

No, you're being an idiot again. I said what you listed as 'literal' was in fact childish misconception.

Seems like your trolling just gets worse with feeding.

I bet you'd love to have a coherent point to make so that you could argue this shit right?

[Reforged]

You keep on about that last time like I didn''t thoroughly answer your adolescent screaming. Granted your lack of basic reading skills is widely displayed, so I hold no malice.

No, you're being an idiot again. I said what you listed as 'literal' was in fact childish misconception.

Seems like your trolling just gets worse with feeding.

Ha ha ha, oh dear me. We're back to this again are we? Look if my age is a concern here then don't worry. I understand it must be embarrassing but you aren't the first person to be outdone by someone younger and you won't be the last.

Now, be a good boy and answer the questions. :-)
"Alright, tell me what interpretation you get from God allowing Abraham to fuck his own daughters. Or even better, tell me about the priest and his concubine. Where he allowed dozens of men to rape, torture and murder her in place of him. Whats your spin on things there?"
Now, be very aware the good people reading this will know if your trying to avoid the questions. I know, annoying right?

[fr0d0]

I have no concern with your age Raph. All I address is what you present. A person of 80 can act like a child. I aspire to treat everyone as an equal in conversations.

My spin on all of those wild misinterpretations is the accepted interpretation. I don't need to explain the default view, as that is very easy to find for anyone. Your indefensible, absurd & twisted POV is what needs proving. All any reasonable person could conclude is that they are indeed, indefensible, absurd, and twisted. But I wish you the best of luck with that.

Repeat. Risnse.