Is everybody equal in atheism?

[Napoléon]

Was I talking to you.

So you were talking to me.

Nice to know the only response your insignificant little brain is capable of when shown to be a liar is 'kiss my ass you fucking prick'.


Beacon of integrity aren't you.

[Aegrus]

ummm, because atheists beleive there is no god.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/atheism

Generally speaking in the real World, dictionaries are a good source of information, opinions however, can be bias at times.

The second definition for atheism in the link you supplied contradicts the first completely.

[Vincenzo Vinny G.]

Why not just assume it was an honest mistake and both sides were just involved in a misunderstanding?

I mean do you REALLY think someone is out to get you or something? Of course not. It's just discourse gone out of hand. He doesn't know you from noodle on a plate for Hitchens sake!

[Napoléon]

No dip shit it was an honest mistake.

Oh it was?

If that's the case then apologise and I will treat you with the respect you deserve.

Telling someone to kiss your ass because YOU have fucked up, is incredibly fucking rude.

I'm supposed to feel sorry for you about being a cunt?

Piss off.

*edit* Ironically you again edit one of your posts (after accusing me of that very thing) to add in another line poorly applied vitriol:

So go and have a sook, you fucking baby.

[ib.me.ub]

Fuck off dick head. I sooner poke your beady little eyes out than apologise. You speak of respect, but have little understanding of the concept.

[Napoléon]

Why not just assume it was an honest mistake

If he were to apologise and say that then I would give him the benefit and accept it, I would then also apologise for my reaction in turn.

But no, instead he told me to kiss his ass.

I like the way I'm supposedly the guy in the wrong here. Fuck me.

---

Fuck off dick head. I sooner poke your eyes out than apologise.

Then we're done. Goodbye asshole.

[greneknight]

I find it irritating when someone (almost always a Christian) insists that an absence of belief is a belief. Such a person must either be stupid or dishonest. How can an absence of belief be a belief?

But I suspect the reason why a religious person goes into that sort of nonsense is he just wants to give his nonsensical belief some respectability. But in the end, it's dishonest. But it's nothing new. Religious people are always dishonest when it comes to debating about faith.

[ib.me.ub]

Why not just assume it was an honest mistake

If he were to apologise and say that then I would give him the benefit and accept it, I would then also apologise for my reaction in turn.

But no, instead he told me to kiss his ass.

I like the way I'm supposedly the guy in the wrong here. Fuck me.

---

Fuck off dick head. I sooner poke your eyes out than apologise.

Then we're done. Goodbye asshole.

Good. If you read back asshole you will see that you flew off the handle. So good, dont fucking talk to me.

---

I find it irritating when someone (almost always a Christian) insists that an absence of belief is a belief. Such a person must either be stupid or dishonest. How can an absence of belief be a belief?

But I suspect the reason why a religious person goes into that sort of nonsense is he just wants to give his nonsensical belief some respectability. But in the end, it's dishonest. But it's nothing new. Religious people are always dishonest when it comes to debating about faith.

What are you on about.

[frankiej]

I find it irritating when someone (almost always a Christian) insists that an absence of belief is a belief. Such a person must either be stupid or dishonest. How can an absence of belief be a belief?

But I suspect the reason why a religious person goes into that sort of nonsense is he just wants to give his nonsensical belief some respectability. But in the end, it's dishonest. But it's nothing new. Religious people are always dishonest when it comes to debating about faith.

I want to kiss you some times... but that would be illegal.

[greneknight]

I find it irritating when someone (almost always a Christian) insists that an absence of belief is a belief. Such a person must either be stupid or dishonest. How can an absence of belief be a belief?

But I suspect the reason why a religious person goes into that sort of nonsense is he just wants to give his nonsensical belief some respectability. But in the end, it's dishonest. But it's nothing new. Religious people are always dishonest when it comes to debating about faith.

What are you on about.

I wrote it in plain English, I believe.