Posts: 3
Threads: 1
Joined: September 21, 2012
Reputation:
0
Church state question
September 21, 2012 at 6:19 pm
Was discussing the issue of C&S. The other argument to me was that the intention was not to keep God out of government, just keep government out of religion. When I questioned how can you allow god in and now have government get mixed in with religion, I was told God is not religion.
Never heard this rationale before. Is this something new?
(my apologies if this is not in the right section)
Posts: 6191
Threads: 124
Joined: November 13, 2009
Reputation:
70
RE: Church state question
September 21, 2012 at 7:28 pm
(This post was last modified: September 21, 2012 at 7:29 pm by Autumnlicious.)
No, it's called trying to have one's cake and eat it too.
If you have God put into government, then any decision made is subject to passing judgement in the guise of one religion onto the potential functioning of another.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Posts: 3160
Threads: 56
Joined: February 14, 2012
Reputation:
39
RE: Church state question
September 21, 2012 at 7:29 pm
Not really, bullshit has been around for ages.
Did you ask them how they had come to that sage like conclusion?
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
Posts: 2844
Threads: 169
Joined: August 24, 2012
Reputation:
46
RE: Church state question
September 21, 2012 at 7:56 pm
It's bullshit.
The founders realized the way religious wars were splitting nations in Europe and they wanted to avoid that. They formed a government that specifically left religious matters to the individuals, not the government. If god gets into politics, what's to stop Catholics from forcing protestants from saying the Hail Mary? Or what's to stop Baptists from banning alcohol, even to non-Baptists? Or what's to stop Jews from outlawing pork?
I live on facebook. Come see me there.
http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto
"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
Posts: 2610
Threads: 22
Joined: May 18, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Church state question
September 21, 2012 at 10:35 pm
(This post was last modified: September 21, 2012 at 11:05 pm by Polaris.)
(September 21, 2012 at 6:19 pm)tfs13 Wrote: Was discussing the issue of C&S. The other argument to me was that the intention was not to keep God out of government, just keep government out of religion. When I questioned how can you allow god in and now have government get mixed in with religion, I was told God is not religion.
Never heard this rationale before. Is this something new?
(my apologies if this is not in the right section)
In the United States, the precursor to the Separation of Church and State (the First Amendment) was to protect religious groups from a state-sponsored religion running their lives.
The Separation of Church and State, first mentioned in in the late 19th century by the Supreme Court (it had a pro-religion tone though), did not take on its current meaning of keeping religion out of government until the 1950s....ironic since this was when "under God" was added.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Church state question
September 22, 2012 at 12:21 pm
You bring up an interesting point, tfs. People who want to remove the Church and State separation have the agenda of inserting their god into the political arena, but I wonder if they realise that by the same toke, they would have to accept government interference in Church matters? Something tells me they probably wouldn't take to that particularly well.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'