And We're Back ... Awe Hell

[catfish]

...............................?

What, did you NOT pay attention to what you wrote?

You supporting "would be proposed", "something may exist", "would look to unify", "we do not currently have a theory ", "We don't know", "would be looking at" and "or so we hope" as fact is FUCKING HILLARIOUS!!!

Seriously dude, goddidit, OK?

So, ignoring the cognitive dissonance I see abounding in here, here's my claim... "When God reveals himself to all, then all will believe in God" (we effin hope) lol!

[The Grand Nudger]

Another ridiculous claim which you couldn't even begin to demonstrate, but you wouldn't have to, because it is absurd at face value. If a god revealed itself to all belief would be required of (or possessed by) none. But who cares, it's blue light special time on ridiculous bullshit from Catfish here at AF.Org, apparently.

Now, on to your babbling about cognitive dissonance and facts.

We don't know
No such theory exists
Your "magical gravity field" would be such a theory

I'm going to ask you bluntly, which one of these three very simple statements confuses you the most? The only person who needs to pay attention to what I wrote in our little equation would be yourself (I'm already aware of what I wrote...I typed it - no magic required-)...assuming, of course, that you want to make an attempt at a competent response.

[Darkstar]

...............................?

What, did you NOT pay attention to what you wrote?

You supporting "would be proposed", "something may exist", "would look to unify", "we do not currently have a theory ", "We don't know", "would be looking at" and "or so we hope" as fact is FUCKING HILLARIOUS!!!

Seriously dude, goddidit, OK?

So, ignoring the cognitive dissonance I see abounding in here, here's my claim... "When God reveals himself to all, then all will believe in God" (we effin hope) lol!

-If- we could unify these two theories we would be looking at that "magical gravity field" you seem to think science assumes (it does not)

Did you miss this part? He isn't presenting it as fact, nor even theory.

---

666 posts! Take your pick:

---

---

[catfish]

Another ridiculous claim which you couldn't even begin to demonstrate, but you wouldn't have to, because it is absurd at face value. If a god revealed itself to all belief would be required of (or possessed by) none. But who cares, it's blue light special time on ridiculous bullshit from Catfish here at AF.Org, apparently.

Now, on to your babbling about cognitive dissonance and facts.

We don't know
No such theory exists
Your "magical gravity field" would be such a theory

I'm going to ask you bluntly, which one of these three very simple statements confuses you the most? The only person who needs to pay attention to what I wrote in our little equation would be yourself (I'm already aware of what I wrote...I typed it - no magic required-)...assuming, of course, that you want to make an attempt at a competent response.

Probrably the third one confuses me most, you seem to have a problem with possesive terms of speech... "My" magical gravity field is actually "YOUR" quantum gravity which is unproven and basically magical bullshit to me. You also seem to forget that science says that all matter decays, so where did the matter from your theoretical singularity come from? I know your answer, "we don't know"...

Would it help you if I refered to God as "energy"???

[The Grand Nudger]

-LOL, It's your baby, not mine. You introduced it so you could argue against it (presumably to draw attention away from the fact that you are unable or unwilling to demonstrate the veracity of the claims you have made in this thread). I'm merely explaining to you what this thing might be -no magic required-. Would you like for me to explain why this sort of hypothesis exists at all(hint hint - experimental evidence of quantum effects)? I mean, if you're going to argue against it you may as well have a clear understanding of what you're arguing against (and whom)...so as to avoid coming off like a dunce.

-You have some problem with uncertainty? Would you prefer a bullshit explanation ? Rhetorical.

-What would be helpful about referring to god as energy? What are you trying to help me with?

[catfish]

-LOL, It's your baby, not mine. You introduced it so you could argue against it (presumably to draw attention away from the fact that you are unable or unwilling to demonstrate the veracity of the claims you have made in this thread). I'm merely explaining to you what this thing might be -no magic required-. Would you like for me to explain why this sort of hypothesis exists at all(hint hint - experimental evidence of quantum effects)? I mean, if you're going to argue against it you may as well have a clear understanding of what you're arguing against (and whom)...so as to avoid coming off like a dunce.

-You have some problem with uncertainty? Would you prefer a bullshit explanation ? Rhetorical.

-What would be helpful about referring to god as energy? What are you trying to help me with?

Dude, you didn't get the memo that it was sarcasm? Seriously, you are supporting the unknown like it was fact. I say God was the cause of the big bang, you say who the fuck knows?

You are trying to argue against the Bible with someone who knows and acknowledges that it's mostly bullshit. Why? I get to cherrypick what I feel is "good", and I say that it's your job to pick what is "good" yet you want me to spoonfeed you still? I think for myself, you should try it sometime...

[The Grand Nudger]

No, and I don;t know how else to explain this to you. I am trying to bring to your attention that there is no theory of a magical gravity field that caused the big bang. It does not exist, it is not assumed. You are arguing against your own imagination.

If you say god was the cause of the big bang, I most definitely do not say "who the fuck knows". I say, "bullshit". I don't know why my car didn't start this morning but I can be pretty certain that my whole grain toast didn't cause that.

You claimed that there was a legitimate word, that it was easy to find, that there was something beyond the text...and now..hilariously, that god caused the big bang. Are you gonna stand there with a straight face and feed me some "what feels good to me" line of bullshit now?

[catfish]

No, and I don;t know how else to explain this to you. I am trying to bring to your attention that there is no theory of a magical gravity field that caused the big bang. It does not exist, it is not assumed. You are arguing against your own imagination.

If you say god was the cause of the big bang, I most definitely do not say "who the fuck knows". I say, "bullshit". I don't know why my car didn't start this morning but I can be pretty certain that my whole grain toast didn't cause that.

You claimed that there was a legitimate word, that it was easy to find, that there was something beyond the text...and now..hilariously, that god caused the big bang. Are you gonna stand there with a straight face and feed me some "what feels good to me" line of bullshit now?

I'm gonna feed you whatever the fuck makes you frustrated. Deal with it...

[The Grand Nudger]

Trolls gotta troll. I love how your claims and confidence have shriveled as this conversation continued.

[catfish]

Trolls gotta troll. I love how your claims and confidence have shriveled as this conversation continued.

Damn man, you're gonna have to dumb it down even more because you seem to be all fluff and no substance if this is all you have. It doesn't matter how loud and often you say something, it doesn't make it true.

So, which claim of mine has shriveled? That "hell" is NOT Biblical? Bring facts if you want make those sorts of claims about me...