Posts: 145
Threads: 11
Joined: September 16, 2012
Reputation:
6
Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
November 9, 2012 at 2:04 pm
Hey guys,
I was wondering how you all felt about this topic.
If I didn't believe in God, it seems to me that I would adopt this belief so I was curious how those those that really don't believe in God feel.
So please let me know what you think. Is it right or wrong and why?
Although I mentioned God above, my intention is not to discuss the existence of God or moral ontology.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
November 9, 2012 at 2:18 pm
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2012 at 2:19 pm by Cyberman.)
Why would you adopt the 'belief' in Social Darwinism if you didn't have your belief in "God"? You're speaking in non sequiturs. I myself do not believe in your god, yet I don't feel the need to adopt any sort of extreme views. I know for a fact that I'm not unique in this. I apologise in advance for the following observation, but based on what you've been sharing around here you remind me of an hypothesis I came across a long time ago. Consider the old valve radio sets. If we remove one valve, and the radio starts howling, do we conclude that the purpose of the valve is to prevent the howling? Similarly, on what basis are we to assume that the removal of a belief in gods will lead inevitably to societal breakdown?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
November 9, 2012 at 2:19 pm
Countdown to mention of Nazi Germany begins in 5 4 3 2.....
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 145
Threads: 11
Joined: September 16, 2012
Reputation:
6
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
November 9, 2012 at 2:32 pm
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2012 at 2:35 pm by Reasonable_Jeff.)
I didn't intend for this to be a thread that focused on me. I'm curious what you guys think.
There have been a few threads lately that ask Christians what they believe on a topic and why...I'm simply doing the same for atheists.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
November 9, 2012 at 2:46 pm
Much as I feel that some sort of social engineering may be beneficial I don't trust the people in power to do it in a compassionate way.
It is a minefield issue like euthanasia.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
November 9, 2012 at 2:50 pm
Jeff, the problem with your question is that there is no clear definition as to what "Social Darwinism" entails. In fact, the term has been applied to several ideological viewpoints that are mutually exclusive.
You're going to need to be more precise to have any kind of meaningful discourse.
Posts: 288
Threads: 2
Joined: October 28, 2012
Reputation:
16
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
November 9, 2012 at 2:59 pm
"Social Darwinism" actually isn't Darwinism. This may come as a surprise to those of you who don't know much about the theory of evolution, but eugenics are the opposite of the survival of the fittest: eugenics supporters actively select some trait, going against natural selection.
So the eugenics program and social engineering in general should be renamed "Social Intelligent Design".
Posts: 1127
Threads: 20
Joined: May 11, 2011
Reputation:
14
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
November 9, 2012 at 3:01 pm
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2012 at 3:02 pm by Darth.)
That would be 'artificial selection' applied to humans then, it's still not design.
Nemo me impune lacessit.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
November 9, 2012 at 3:04 pm
(November 9, 2012 at 2:59 pm)Kirbmarc Wrote: So the eugenics program and social engineering in general should be renamed "Social Intelligent Design".
Or social meddling, I seem to recall that the times in the past when it has been tried there has always been some unpleasant underlying agenda.
If there was a way to erradicate congenital diseases by not allowing the carrier to reproduce would it be beneficial or would we risk losing other genes that would help overall?
Wouldn't it be better to cure the disease?
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
