Math has a liberal bias

[Dee Dee Ramone]

Isn't there a war going on in Syria or something, Fox 'news'?

[A Theist]

Isn't there a war going on in Syria or something, Fox 'news'?

Yeah Fox News!!!!....what's up with you guys?!....why aren't you doing more reporting that Barack seems more interested in campaigning for the mid term elections and passing gun control legislation and immigration reform than he does curbing his spending appetite, bringing down the national debt, and creating jobs?

[Autumnlicious]

Looks more like a liberal spin...it was clearly 'Distributing the wealth' that Fox took issue with...

"Distributing the wealth" is a perfectly valid sentence under multiple contexts, including that of employment.

A question:
Do you pay your employees?

If so, then you're distributing the wealth of the company profits to fulfill contractual obligations under terms of salaries/payments.

Or are you going to rail behind the apolitical words of "distribute", "wealth"?

If so, then you are:
1) A complete idiot
2) Someone who either can't accept that the aforementioned phrase is identical to the following phrase: "If so, then you're fulfilling contractual obligations under terms of salaries and payments via monetary transfer"

Really.

It's that simple.

---

IE to make this simpler:

'monetary transfer' between a set of entities (includes individuals, groups, companies, government) to another set of entities is 'distributing the wealth' between a set of entities to another set of entities.

They imply the same thing.

What you could be objecting to is the irrelevant concept of distributing taxed monies to some set of people you want deprived of.

In that case, you're projecting congressional responsibilities of taxation and budgeting onto grade school mathematics where it is a (stupid) metaphor.

[Minimalist]

If so, then you are:
1) A complete idiot

I'll go with #1. He's proven it on numerous occasions.

[A Theist]

Looks more like a liberal spin...it was clearly 'Distributing the wealth' that Fox took issue with...

"Distributing the wealth" is a perfectly valid sentence under multiple contexts, including that of employment.

A question:
Do you pay your employees?

If so, then you're distributing the wealth of the company profits to fulfill contractual obligations under terms of salaries/payments.

Or are you going to rail behind the apolitical words of "distribute", "wealth"?

If so, then you are:
1) A complete idiot
2) Someone who either can't accept that the aforementioned phrase is identical to the following phrase: "If so, then you're fulfilling contractual obligations under terms of salaries and payments via monetary transfer"

Really.

It's that simple.

---

IE to make this simpler:

'monetary transfer' between a set of entities (includes individuals, groups, companies, government) to another set of entities is 'distributing the wealth' between a set of entities to another set of entities.

They imply the same thing.

What you could be objecting to is the irrelevant concept of distributing taxed monies to some set of people you want deprived of.

In that case, you're projecting congressional responsibilities of taxation and budgeting onto grade school mathematics where it is a (stupid) metaphor.

Lol....what a load of Bullshit....

....the best way to distribute wealth in this country is for your guy Barack to keep his promises that he would concentrate more on curbing his spending appetite and to cut the national debt when he campaigned in '08,...and to start creating more and better paying jobs like he also promised in '08 and 2012!....Barack and the rest of the leftwing smear merchants on capitol hill are more interested in campaigning for the next midterm elections and increasing our already $16 trillion debt. Also in his immediate agenda is immigration reform and gun control legislation while he holds the rest of the country hostage with threats of higher taxes, as well as threatening entitlement checks and government payroll if congress doesn't hand him a blank check to raise the debt ceiling, again!

[Anomalocaris]

How about let's just say it takes an idiot to be a conservative? If you are a conservative, or if you are A Theist, you are an idiot.

[Autumnlicious]

Lol....what a load of Bullshit....

I am now expecting a rebuttal on the topic of language with relating to the phrase "distribute the wealth" under the context of grade school mathematics as this thread is all about.

Continue.

....the best way to distribute wealth in this country is for your guy Barack to keep his promises that he would concentrate more on curbing his spending appetite and to cut the national debt when he campaigned in '08,...and to start creating more and better paying jobs like he also promised in '08 and 2012!....Barack and the rest of the leftwing smear merchants on capitol hill are more interested in campaigning for the next midterm elections and increasing our already $16 trillion debt. Also in his immediate agenda is immigration reform and gun control legislation while he holds the rest of the country hostage with threats of higher taxes, as well as threatening entitlement checks and government payroll if congress doesn't hand him a blank check to raise the debt ceiling, again!

Ok Grandpa, when can you keep on topic instead of going into a rant about your political fantasies?

I talked about the insanity of claiming a grade school math problem has a political meaning, breaking down the sentence and finding analogous meanings to prove if or if there is not a political bias.

There was none that I can tell.

The burden of proof falls to you to show how the phrasing implies anything more than what it is -- a children's math problem.

Oh, and get a refill of Prozac -- no one was discussing Obama or democrats or illegal immigrants. The discussion was on a math problem and the reaction to it by Fox News.

[CapnAwesome]

How about let's just say it takes an idiot to be a conservative? If you are a conservative, or if you are A Theist, you are an idiot.

I sort of wonder if you actually believe that conservatives have lower IQs than liberals? I mean there have been surveys done about this sort of stuff. (Hint, Republicans actually average 3 IQ points higher than Democrats.) As an Atheist shouldn't you be concerned about paying attention to the evidence before just saying stuff.

http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2008/11/po...crats.html

[A Theist]

---

Lol....what a load of Bullshit....

---

[Autumnlicious]

The usual bullshit I see from you.

Everyone: "Fox news is taking issue with this math problem. How weird"

A Theist: "Barack Barack Baraka Rabble Rabble Rabble"

Others: "We're not talking about Obama's performance."

A Theist: "Tough. Barack Barack Barack Noise Noise Noise Noise! Liberals Liberals Liberals!"

---

Shit. Shit everywhere. Oh well, I suppose old dogs can't be house broken.

But they can be shot. If only.