Always.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 2, 2025, 6:53 pm
Thread Rating:
Refuting Creationist Claims - Part 1: Noah's Ark
|
RE: Refuting Creationist Claims - Part 1: Noah's Ark
February 13, 2013 at 5:05 am
(This post was last modified: February 13, 2013 at 5:06 am by Angrboda.)
(February 12, 2013 at 1:03 pm)FallentoReason Wrote:(February 12, 2013 at 12:56 pm)Stimbo Wrote: You have to remember that you're dealing with people who tie themselves, and the evidence, into knots trying to cram the bible stories into the natural world, failing to realise that once you allow the idea of magic into the equation, all natural explanations go flying to the Moon. It's as though they entertain the scientific view of the world up to the point at which it conflicts with the mythology; whereupon they pull the handle labelled "God" and instantly eject from reality. It's hard to take someone's arguments seriously when they keep having to be rescued by invoking the theistic equivalent of "a wizard did it". Embrace your inner theist, FtR. Honestly, it won't hurt. And we Hindus have a full selection of priced-to-own gods, just ready for you to become one with. (February 13, 2013 at 5:05 am)apophenia Wrote:(February 12, 2013 at 1:03 pm)FallentoReason Wrote: This is why Deism is the only honest possibility. The unchangeableness of nature makes it the perfect medium for a "divine message" as opposed to the ignorant scribblings of mammals living 2000 years ago. The self-evident truths of nature obliterate the theists' fables based on their god's own creation i.e. the universe i.e. nature. They're shooting themselves in the foot. Half sarcasm, half serious, or..? "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
I was arguing once with a cretinist who was using the records of ancient civilizations such as China to prove the Flood.
Apparently, according to this site Prior to the Flood the records of pre flood cilvilizations showed that their kings lived for hundreds of years then after the flood they didn't live so long. The conversation died off after I asked, "Weren't those civilizations and their records wiped out in the Flood?" BTW the whole damn site is pretty fucking funny If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)