Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 3, 2025, 12:03 am
Thread Rating:
Bible Teachings or Traditions of Men?
|
RE: Bible Teachings or Traditions of Men?
April 8, 2013 at 6:23 am
(This post was last modified: April 8, 2013 at 6:25 am by Kayenneh.)
Drich Wrote:I haven't gone any where. i check back here and read new posts two or three times aday. I even started a thread a week or so ago. My inactivity is due to the lack of content (By you good people) that I have purposed myself to speak to. Ah, forgive me for the confusion, my comment was for Alter2Ego, not for you Drich When I was young, there was a god with infinite power protecting me. Is there anyone else who felt that way? And was sure about it? but the first time I fell in love, I was thrown down - or maybe I broke free - and I bade farewell to God and became human. Now I don't have God's protection, and I walk on the ground without wings, but I don't regret this hardship. I want to live as a person. -Arina Tanemura
(April 6, 2013 at 9:42 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE: Who told you it was the inspired word of some god and why did you believe them? Quote:1. THE TRINITY Sorry but very prosaic here. The Greeks held a person was composed of body, mind, soul and spirit. Take away the body and you have mind, soul and (holy) spirit. It is such a simple thing one has to wonder how Christians make such a big deal of it. RE: Bible Teachings or Traditions of Men?
April 8, 2013 at 9:56 am
(This post was last modified: April 8, 2013 at 10:02 am by Drich.)
(April 8, 2013 at 1:17 am)Alter2Ego Wrote:You have listed yourself as a Christian, Are you ashamed of your faith? Why else wouldn't you answer my very direct question? (Are you a mormon or a jehovah witness?) I will not be answering any of your questions until you answer mine. Qui pro quoe Clarice, Qui pro quoe.(April 7, 2013 at 1:01 am)Drich Wrote: Hell Fire. Is Real and Scripture tells us it is eternal, and that it was stoked specifically for lucifer and his followers, meaning demons (not for us.)ALTER2EGO -to- DRICH: (April 8, 2013 at 6:23 am)Kayenneh Wrote:Drich Wrote:I haven't gone any where. i check back here and read new posts two or three times aday. I even started a thread a week or so ago. My inactivity is due to the lack of content (By you good people) that I have purposed myself to speak to. (April 8, 2013 at 6:35 am)A_Nony_Mouse Wrote:ALTER2EGO -to- A NONY MOUSE:(April 6, 2013 at 9:42 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE: Evidence that the Judeo-Christian Bible is inspired by Almighty God Jehovah is seen in the accurate fulfillment of nearly 2,000 Bible prophecies, many of which are confirmed by secular history and archeology. (April 10, 2013 at 2:10 am)Alter2Ego Wrote:(April 8, 2013 at 6:35 am)A_Nony_Mouse Wrote: Who told you it was the inspired word of some god and why did you believe them?ALTER2EGO -to- A NONY MOUSE: Who told you the prophecies were made before the events and why did you believe them? Are you not aware the bible stories first appear in history in the mid 2nd c. BC long after the "prophecies" were fulfilled? Prophesies are easy when made after the fact. Back before Jimmy Carter was president I prophesied he would appear in The Daily Show to discuss the Guinea Worm. Why are you not impressed? I can deal with your nonsense claims all day in the same way. I do hope you will continue to play. (April 7, 2013 at 10:43 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: ALTER2EGO -to- DRICH: Oh for god's sake. If you people want to play this game why don't you find a nice Christian website? I don't want to hear chapter, verse or anything else from your retched little book of Jewish fairy tales. I mean, I know this is an open forum and welcomes all view points but at least bring your own. If you have anything worth saying, use your own words and leave the fucking bible out of it.
ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:
The fabricated term "Godhead" goes hand in hand with the false trinity teaching that officially became the central doctrine of the "Christianized" Romans in the 4th century C.E. (The Christianized Romans later came to be known as the Roman Catholic Church.) The teaching of trinity that survives today began to be formalized in 325 CE/AD at the Council of Nicaea. On that occasion, about 300 Catholic bishops met with Roman Emperor Constantine"a non-Christian who was not baptized until he lay dying. Regarding Constantine's role in the formulation of the Trinity, the Encyclopedia Britannica states: "Constantine himself presided, actively guiding the discussions, and personally proposed... the crucial formula expressing the relation of Christ to God in the creed issued by the council, [that Christ was] 'of one substance with the Father.' " Keep in mind that Jesus died, was resurrected, and returned to heaven in 33 C.E. and that this idea that would later evolve into the trinity did not officially become "Christian" dogma until 381 C.E.--more than 300 years after Jesus Christ left the earthly scene. Also keep in mind that the idea of trinity was the philosophy of apostate "Christianized" Romans who later came to be known as Roman Catholics. But most important, keep in mind that the ROMANS who executed Jesus--prior to adopting Christianity as the state religion--had a long history of polytheism (worship of many gods). It was therefore a simple matter for the Christianized Romans aka Roman Catholics to graft various pagan/false teachings into their version of Christianity. One such teaching became the "Christian" version of trinity or worship of a triune/triad (three-in-one) god. (April 7, 2013 at 1:01 am)Drich Wrote: The trinitarian doctrine is a teaching or compilation of scripture that identifies God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. While the word it self has nothing to do with bible passages the core message is firmly rooted in scripture. It's kinda like calling The Prayer Jesus taught us in Luke 11 the Lord's prayer. The bible Does not say it is the Lord's prayer, it is just a 'religious/doctrinal' identification of a scriptural teaching. Just because the bible does not specifically say it is the Lord's Prayer does not mean the Lord did not teach us to pray this prayer. Again - sorry - but the BIBLE is not a source of truth - so to claim that hell is real is equivalent to claiming that the earth is a flat circle - as the bible says The word "scripture" simply means a writing or story - and the bible is clearly a bunch of fairy tales - religious MYTH and LEGEND - and does not even IMPLY truth - since most of it is not As far as the Trinity - it is a creation of the catholic church and has no reality - since their god has no proven reality as well. Passages from the bible itself contradict the teaching about the trinity - clearly. RE: Bible Teachings or Traditions of Men?
April 21, 2013 at 10:05 am
(This post was last modified: April 21, 2013 at 10:17 am by A_Nony_Mouse.)
(April 7, 2013 at 1:01 am)Drich Wrote: The trinitarian doctrine is a teaching or compilation of scripture that identifies God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. That is obfuscation. It is crap. Greek philosophers held a person was composed of body, mind, soul and spirit. The Greeks gods had bodies. The Christian god supposedly has none. Without a body there is only Mind, Soul and (holy) Spirit. The "son" crap comes from imagining the gospel use of FATHER had a different meaning from the usage in the Our Father. In other words it is all a desperate attempt to hide the Greek origin of the three out of four idea. (April 7, 2013 at 10:52 pm)Drich Wrote: I am assuming your focus on the doctrine of the trinity means you have conceeded your assertion of an eternal Hell? The official spokesrats for the vast majority of Christians, the Vatican, does not teach the idea of that kind of hell. That kind of hell was invented by Dante. (April 21, 2013 at 1:11 am)ThomM Wrote: ... What gets me about that is no place in the bible does it claim to be a source of truth or even true. The closest thing to a claim of authenticity in all the books is found in the opening sentences of G. Luke where it claims to only be a collection along the lines of the Muslim Hadith. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)