RE: If Not Hell then what?
April 21, 2013 at 1:47 am
(This post was last modified: April 21, 2013 at 1:47 am by Minimalist.)
Quote:If you really want proof then just A/S/K.
I asked you. As usual, you have oogatz.
|
If Not Hell then what?
|
|
RE: If Not Hell then what?
April 21, 2013 at 1:47 am
(This post was last modified: April 21, 2013 at 1:47 am by Minimalist.)
Quote:If you really want proof then just A/S/K. I asked you. As usual, you have oogatz. RE: If Not Hell then what?
April 22, 2013 at 7:11 am
(This post was last modified: April 22, 2013 at 7:12 am by Zen Badger.)
(April 18, 2013 at 10:06 am)Drich Wrote: If you believe Hell to be immoral or just plain wrong, then what would you suggest God do with those who do not want to serve Him for eternity? Drich, why this pathological desire to torture people who don't believe the same way as you do? It's not healthy you know. I would suggest that you seek some professional help. ![]() If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
If not Hell then what?
According to the majority of god fearing fools ... Hell is full of engineers and scientists and artisans of all talents. Hell? With such a population I would expect it to be and air-conditioned, landscaped and financially viable place by now. Heaven? full of the worthless portions of humanity to scared to say boo. "The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
(April 22, 2013 at 10:05 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: If not Hell then what? Kichi, you're kinda awesome.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould (April 22, 2013 at 10:06 am)Tonus Wrote:(April 22, 2013 at 10:05 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: If not Hell then what? Eh? Thank you.
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
RE: If Not Hell then what?
April 22, 2013 at 10:43 am
(This post was last modified: April 22, 2013 at 10:57 am by Drich.)
(April 22, 2013 at 10:43 am)Drich Wrote: Again because most of you complain without any point or end goal. If you truly believed that this God had no power I believe there would not be a discussion. I that is why I believe that there is enough doubt in your (generally speaking) mind to want to argue the fairness of Hell. No, the fairness of hell is discussed as an attempt to show believers what a monster of a god they believe in. I mean, I can discuss Mordor without having a doubt about Middle Earth not existing. Of course, this doesn't work with you, because you seem to enjoy believing in a monster god.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist Quote:I could provide you with proof, but it would only be a one way ticket. No, you can't Drippy. All you can do is spout useless pseudo-philosophical babble about your sky-daddy. That is not evidence. That is bullshit. (April 22, 2013 at 10:43 am)Drich Wrote: However what I can not phathom is how persumptious the idea is that 'we' as a people believe we have it all figured out only after a few hundred years of searching. Or at least figured out enough so you can claim that your version of reality is the only one.So you wish to claim that the believer that believes in something made up in a few instances of human imagination has access to a potentially more accurate version of reality? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|