Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 16, 2025, 2:01 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hell
RE: Hell
Got proof? Tongue
Mark Taylor: "Religious conflict will be less a matter of struggles between belief and unbelief than of clashes between believers who make room for doubt and those who do not."

Einstein: “The most unintelligible thing about nature is that it is intelligible”
Reply
RE: Hell
Got evidence of any god at all?

EvF
Reply
RE: Hell
The proof is in the fact that you "think" he is there and defend him without any proof of his existence beside your own convictions.
There is nothing people will not maintain when they are slaves to superstition

http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/

Reply
RE: Hell
(October 30, 2009 at 4:59 pm)solarwave Wrote: Got proof? Tongue

(October 30, 2009 at 5:15 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Got evidence of any god at all?

EvF

(October 30, 2009 at 8:28 pm)chatpilot Wrote: The proof is in the fact that you "think" he is there and defend him without any proof of his existence beside your own convictions.

ROFLOL
Reply
RE: Hell
I have reasons why I believe in God, but I have pretty much given up trying to explain them here since it seems many people here ether don't want to believe or ask for irrationally high levels of proof and then restrict that proof only to repeatable scientific evidence. That may work for cold hard laws, but not for a personal immateral God.
Mark Taylor: "Religious conflict will be less a matter of struggles between belief and unbelief than of clashes between believers who make room for doubt and those who do not."

Einstein: “The most unintelligible thing about nature is that it is intelligible”
Reply
RE: Hell
Quote:then restrict that proof only to repeatable scientific evidence.

And thus, to close the circle for the umpteenth time, is why we reject your silly visions of a 'god.'

Do you get it now?
Reply
RE: Hell
(October 31, 2009 at 10:47 am)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:then restrict that proof only to repeatable scientific evidence.

And thus, to close the circle for the umpteenth time, is why we reject your silly visions of a 'god.'

Do you get it now?

We see the absurdity of your logic Min yes, absolutely. Are you saying that you're a lost cause?
Reply
RE: Hell
(October 31, 2009 at 10:47 am)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:then restrict that proof only to repeatable scientific evidence.

And thus, to close the circle for the umpteenth time, is why we reject your silly visions of a 'god.'

Do you get it now?

I do understand now, and that is why I say it is irrational to close your mind so much to other ways of knowing things.
Mark Taylor: "Religious conflict will be less a matter of struggles between belief and unbelief than of clashes between believers who make room for doubt and those who do not."

Einstein: “The most unintelligible thing about nature is that it is intelligible”
Reply
RE: Hell
By the way, when Minimalist says "we" he of course cannot actually be speaking for all 'us atheists'.

I for one disagree with him for instance.

I'd accept any valid evidence. And I do not see how scientific evidence suffices anyway because it seems to me that deities are unfalsfiable, and unless something can be falsified it cannot be science.

EvF
Reply
RE: Hell
Quote:Are you saying that you're a lost cause?


I'm saying you believe in fucking fairy tales.



Quote:I'd accept any valid evidence.


There cannot be valid proof of an invalid assertion. Feel free to join the fairy tale chorus if you like.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What the Hell,is Hell anyway? Vern Cliff 31 8099 October 15, 2015 at 1:17 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Hell Houses (AKA: Hallelujah Houses, Heaven or Hell, Christian Haunted House, etc.) Strider 25 7855 December 3, 2014 at 3:07 pm
Last Post: abaris



Users browsing this thread: 33 Guest(s)