The Burden of Proof Revisited

[genkaus]

Showing them doesn't mean they'll accept it, unfortunately.

Whether or not it has been disproven does not depend on anybody's acceptance.

[Cheerful Charlie]

You can't logically disprove that which isn't logical.

???

I think showing that it isn't logical is good enough.

No, Christians will happily relinquish all logic when backed to the wall.
"How do you, a limited mortal hope to possibly understand the ways of an infinite God!?" "God is inscrutible"

"Reason is the Devil's greatest whore; by nature and manner of being she is a noxious whore; she is a prostitute, the Devil's appointed whore; whore eaten by scab and leprosy who ought to be trodden under foot and destroyed, she and her wisdom ... Throw dung in her face to make her ugly. She is and she ought to be drowned in baptism... She would deserve, the wretch, to be banished to the filthiest place in the house, to the closets."
Martin Luther, Erlangen Edition v. 16, pp. 142-148

"Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has; it never comes to the aid of spiritual things, but -- more frequently than not -- struggles against the divine Word, treating with contempt all that emanates from God."
Martin Luther

"Reason must be deluded, blinded, and destroyed. Faith must trample underfoot all reason, sense, and understanding, and whatever it sees must be put out of sight and ... know nothing but the word of God."
Martin Luther

Cheerful Charlie