Login

Zone · (This post was last modified: September 17, 2013 at 8:50 am by Zone.)

If you get rid of the Old Testament the New Testament and Jesus does become a bit redundant. Also you lose all the prophecy concerning the Jewish Messiah. And there's the ten commandments Christians still generally love all that stuff.

Angrboda · September 17, 2013 at 8:51 am

(September 17, 2013 at 12:20 am)Stimbo Wrote: Incidentally, bananas (I hope I never have to type that word again) aren't fruits, though they can be classed as inanimate objects. Generally speaking.

What?

Zone · (This post was last modified: September 17, 2013 at 8:53 am by Zone.)

Wild bananas contain seeds so they're fruit the ones we eat are a mutated seedless variety. They fit right in the hand.

AtheistCreed · September 17, 2013 at 3:16 pm

(September 17, 2013 at 8:52 am)Zone Wrote: Wild bananas contain seeds so they're fruit the ones we eat are a mutated seedless variety. They fit right in the hand.

That analogy can be used for the male genitalia as well. I suppose that is why Priests are always trying to fit it into god's creation: the hand wraps gently around it just like the banana, and it fits snug in the rectum.

Facepalm

Bad Writer · September 17, 2013 at 3:31 pm

(September 17, 2013 at 2:31 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote:
(September 17, 2013 at 2:22 am)BadWriterSparty Wrote: This is wrong. I know plenty of Xtians who don't give two shits about the god of the OT. They cherry pick only that which they like, which is usually just the message of love given by Jaysus. They even get offended at the notion of believing in a god like Yahweh.

That's a good thing, though maybe they should read the bible more. Still if they don't believe in the god of the old testament then what are they being saved from, and why the ten commandments.

I don't think even half of them know the answer. They just like what sounds good, and a paradasaical afterlife is about the best the could hope for.

~~catfish~~ · September 17, 2013 at 5:39 pm

There's a difference between an assumption and a conclusion.
Some of you folk need to learn the difference...

Lemonvariable72 · September 17, 2013 at 11:41 pm

(September 17, 2013 at 5:39 pm)catfish Wrote: There's a difference between an assumption and a conclusion.
Some of you folk need to learn the difference...

You ever watch john V. and drich at there best?

Bad Writer · September 18, 2013 at 1:36 am

Their best? You just made me giggle.

**Ryantology** · September 18, 2013 at 2:26 am

For guys such as Drich, Godschild and Waldorf, there is absolutely no distinction between the two. And, this makes them feel proud instead of ashamed.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	My forum message to theists	robvalue	28	4853	December 28, 2016 at 10:03 pm Last Post: Crossless2.0
	Forum theists: when you have a moment, please...	Athene	125	30796	October 27, 2015 at 11:09 am Last Post: Mr Greene
	Questions for theists (and ex-theists, too)	Longhorn	15	5390	April 23, 2015 at 3:42 pm Last Post: orangebox21
	Violence is the Natural conclusion of Religion.	Spooky	34	6664	March 17, 2015 at 2:22 pm Last Post: Smaug
	Theists: What makes your claims right and the claims of other theists wrong?	Ryantology	29	9158	March 21, 2014 at 9:59 am Last Post: Phatt Matt s
	Some Tips for Theists on an Atheist Forum	Rev. Rye	57	16901	December 18, 2011 at 8:35 pm Last Post: Jackalope