Evolution Trumps Creationism

[Drich]

But with the divisions and chapter/verse structure that wasn't present in the initial text... and yet somehow you think it's okay to switch between one version and the other, depending what will best suit your position, undoubtedly formed from reading the english text to begin with?

The denotations of BCV are for the purposes of intense study to reference and easily find portions of scripture not to start and stop indivisual context.

I can switch from translation to translation because all the translations I use are translated from the same core texts, not to get a different meaning. I do it to make it easier for you all so read a text in most situations, or if I go to a more detailed one to provide clarity when a given passage is being confused. As the final appeal to authority I will turn to the Greek or Hebrew.

[Jackie]

"Scripture" is simply a superstitious word for "script". The bible is a horrible script, poorly written were the real villain(fictional sky daddy) like a dictator or Mafia boss uses threats and bribes to keep you in line. Sets up the game without any consent of the governed, rigs the game, then blames you for the game he set up.

Drich, you worship a CONCEPT, and a very vile concept. There is no real god to worship. But you ARE a victim of mind slavery.

[Waratah]

[Drich]

I agree with alpo, because she identified the problem. I do not see the problem you are trying to bring to my attention.

You do not see it because if you do then your whole 'ministry and belief system' is wrong. Ever heard of the expression of 'putting all your eggs in one basket'.

You presented a problem I provided a solution, you simply rephrased and do not see or understand how my original answer still answers your question. If you've asked another question I still do not see it.

You are either intellectually dishonest or ignorant. Either way a/s/k is invalid.

Without 'proof' these are unfounded accusations. if you believe them to be true anyway you have moved into delusion. You are lying to yourself despite that fact that your conclusions are unsupported with truth.

So how does that differ from what you have accused me of doing? (without proof mind you.)

[Minimalist]

As the final appeal to authority I will turn to the Greek or Hebrew.

Silly shit remains silly shit no matter what language it is written in.

[Waratah]

You do not see it because if you do then your whole 'ministry and belief system' is wrong. Ever heard of the expression of 'putting all your eggs in one basket'.
You are either intellectually dishonest or ignorant. Either way a/s/k is invalid.

Without 'proof' these are unfounded accusations. if you believe them to be true anyway you have moved into delusion. You are lying to yourself despite that fact that your conclusions are unsupported with truth.

So how does that differ from what you have accused me of doing? (without proof mind you.)

Difference is you avoid my posts. Reply to my rebuttals and/or answer my questions from this post.

[Jackie]

As the final appeal to authority I will turn to the Greek or Hebrew.

Silly shit remains silly shit no matter what language it is written in.

I was just going to post something, but you said it for me.

You could translate the Koran in french and Japanese but that will never make Allah a real god.

I have said many times, even before you get to the first letter of ANY version of ANY holy book of ANY religion, you still are stupidly swallowing the idea that some invisible human like entity with a magic wand exists.

Anything that follows "super natural being" is an argument as shitty as claiming invisible pink unicorns.

[Drich]

[Waratah]

[Drich]

You've seem more than willing to compound this arguement needlessly so I will simplify it by taking on one subject matter at a time.

You are being intellectually dishonest. No where in the verses you showed says anything about a neighbour being someone who is close by. If that would be true then the robbers, priest and levite would be classified as neighbours, which is incorrect since only the one who showed mercy is classified as the neighbour. If you cannot admit your error here you are a liar.

The reason I used the word neighbor instead of friend. I was simply trying to simply the story here. There were three friends being mentioned in the parable. The one who came to see his friend for a long ways away. Friend 1 friend two was friends with both men he was the one looking for bread at midnight. Friend 3 was only friends with the guy looking for bread. I called hi. A neighbor because that separates him from friend one and identifies him as the guy with the bread with out further identifying friend 2. I have conceded the scriptures identify him as a friend. That said I kept using the term neighbor as it still applies. Because Christ per the parable of the good sameritain identifies anyone that your in proximity with as your neighbor. Which means technically it is correct to call friend 1,2,3 neighbors.

Do you understand this? If yes also understand your use of the word friend in an arguement mean and has never meant anything to me as I use the terms interchangeably

I will not continue till you agree to put this issue to rest.