Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 6:16 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 9, 2013 at 10:04 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:
(October 9, 2013 at 10:02 am)Psykhronic Wrote: I'm still trying to figure out this "no God" assumption SoC is talking about. The argument reads a lot like "I don't know anything, therefore I'm going to make shit up".

If you do not understand that the no God assumption is being used and why that could mean that all of modern origin science is false, then you missing a major point.

If you don't understand that you're full of shit, you're missing everything.
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
But Gracie here believes that the speed of light was faster 6,000 years ago, so that's why we see distant stars.

And for that matter, why would God ever even bother with creating the distant stars and planets if life on Earth is what's important? Aside from navigation they've never really helped us much.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 9, 2013 at 10:04 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:
(October 9, 2013 at 10:02 am)Psykhronic Wrote: I'm still trying to figure out this "no God" assumption SoC is talking about. The argument reads a lot like "I don't know anything, therefore I'm going to make shit up".

If you do not understand that the no God assumption is being used and why that could mean that all of modern origin science is false, then you missing a major point.

To a similar or different degree to you missing a functioning brain?

But, please, tell us again. Why is 'modern science' [???] false? I do so love a good laugh, Grace.
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 9, 2013 at 11:28 am)Doubting Thomas Wrote: But Gracie here believes that the speed of light was faster 6,000 years ago, so that's why we see distant stars.

And for that matter, why would God ever even bother with creating the distant stars and planets if life on Earth is what's important? Aside from navigation they've never really helped us much.

Why?... DUH!
Astrology!
Those stars and planets play a role on our individual personalities!!
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
I've never understood why people think that the movement of stars thousands or millions of light years away has any bearing whatsoever on people's lives here on earth. But then I look at religion and it all makes sense: People want to feel special.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
People ARE special!
They are the special product of some awesome skydaddy and .... skymommy?
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 9, 2013 at 11:47 am)Doubting Thomas Wrote: I've never understood why people think that the movement of stars thousands or millions of light years away has any bearing whatsoever on people's lives here on earth. But then I look at religion and it all makes sense: People want to feel special.

Not to support astrology, but an inadequate theory for a phenomenon is not itself proof against the phenomenon. There are plenty of phenomenon which are undooubtedly real but for which we lack an adequate theory or causal explanation.


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrp...pouidnfvtl]
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 9, 2013 at 11:57 am)apophenia Wrote:
(October 9, 2013 at 11:47 am)Doubting Thomas Wrote: I've never understood why people think that the movement of stars thousands or millions of light years away has any bearing whatsoever on people's lives here on earth. But then I look at religion and it all makes sense: People want to feel special.

Not to support astrology, but an inadequate theory for a phenomenon is not itself proof against the phenomenon. There are plenty of phenomenon which are undooubtedly real but for which we lack an adequate theory or causal explanation.



I know of no saved Christians that believe in astrology.
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 10, 2013 at 9:16 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:
(October 9, 2013 at 11:57 am)apophenia Wrote: Not to support astrology, but an inadequate theory for a phenomenon is not itself proof against the phenomenon. There are plenty of phenomenon which are undooubtedly real but for which we lack an adequate theory or causal explanation.



I know of no saved Christians that believe in astrology.

Do you know of any "saved" christians?
How would you know that they have been "saved"?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Good Christians only may answer... Gawdzilla Sama 58 23431 September 18, 2018 at 3:22 pm
Last Post: Bob Kelso
  While Judaism may have had forced marriage war booties, i think it reasons is for it Rakie 17 7671 August 2, 2017 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Lol the bible is actually ok with pedophilia, proof from passage Rarieo 80 40923 July 29, 2017 at 12:50 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Christianity actually condones murder Rolandson 50 20931 January 21, 2017 at 10:09 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Truth in a story which is entirely dependent upon subjective interpretation Astonished 47 14884 January 10, 2017 at 8:57 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Catholicism would actually be the most likely controlled Christianity Rolandson 10 4122 January 1, 2017 at 11:44 am
Last Post: Redoubtable
  What do non-fundamentalist Christians actually believe? Fromper 66 38173 June 30, 2016 at 7:08 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  You Can't Disprove a Miracle Rhondazvous 155 40652 March 18, 2016 at 11:05 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Hi, I'm a Christian. Help Me Disprove My Religion! WishfulThinking 265 108447 October 11, 2015 at 9:20 am
Last Post: Cyberman
Question Dear Christians: What does your god actually do? Aractus 144 80199 October 9, 2015 at 6:38 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)