Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 4, 2024, 8:48 pm
Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
LastPoet Offline
Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm)
*****
Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione
Posts: 18503
Threads: 79
Joined: May 29, 2010
Reputation: 125
#91
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 7:17 am
Wait, Esquilax, are you trying to fight fire with fire? Hmmm it might work.
Find
Reply
Zen Badger Offline
Life @ the speed of bike
****
Religious Views: I like 3.14159
Posts: 5389
Threads: 52
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation: 48
#92
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 7:18 am
Fact is Gracie, that every field of science we have points to a old universe. Not a young one.

Good luck disproving them all

My favourite being the size of the observable universe, which should kill doubt in even the most obtuse of minds.

But apparently doesn't.
[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Find
Reply
Esquilax Offline
A Death Star for bad arguments.
*****
Religious Views: AF's own William Lane Craig
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation: 123
#93
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 7:21 am
(October 8, 2013 at 7:17 am)LastPoet Wrote: Wait, Esquilax, are you trying to fight fire with fire? Hmmm it might work.

Not if you point it out. Wink
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Find
Reply
max-greece Offline Donators
Donator
*****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 2177
Threads: 45
Joined: June 5, 2013
Reputation: 39
#94
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 7:22 am
(October 8, 2013 at 7:17 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:
(October 8, 2013 at 7:10 am)max-greece Wrote: "1. I have already proved that atheistic origin science is false.
Therefore "the God did nothing" assumption has already been proven false forever.

You cannot use dating beyond recorded history because you do not know what God did.

You have an assumption of no God that is already been proven false.

2. Radio carbon dating is inaccurate beyond several thousand years.

The reason is that the CO2 levels were much higher in the past (before the flood) so the technique is useless for dating back beyond the flood."

Could you point out those proofs - I appear to have missed them, silly me.

BTW - there was no flood.

Here is an article stating that CO2 levels were 20 times present levels in the past.

The article is incorrect about when that happened of course. But the evidence for much higher CO2 levels in the past is true. So if about 5000 years ago, CO2 levels were 20x todays levels, something would be measured as mush older.

The no God assumption has been proven false by this topic and the other topics I have posted.

You cannot use it for dating beyond recorded history.

No article attached.
No proof that dating is wrong.

Gracie,

We have tree rings that go back further than 6,000 years (9,000? from memory). No need to dispute radio-dating. Tree rings - about as basic as it gets.
Find
Reply
Ben Davis Offline
Tea and Biscuits Man
***
Religious Views: Irreligious
Posts: 2281
Threads: 16
Joined: January 17, 2010
Reputation: 69
#95
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 7:25 am
(October 8, 2013 at 7:05 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: 1. I have already proved that atheistic origin science is false.
Therefore "the God did nothing" assumption has already been proven false forever.
This is an outright lie.

Quote:You cannot use dating beyond recorded history because you do not know what God did.
Another lie.

Quote:You have an assumption of no God that is already been proven false.
Yet another lie.

Quote:2. Radio carbon dating is inaccurate beyond several thousand years.
More lying.

Quote:The reason is that the CO2 levels were much higher in the past (before the flood) so the technique is useless for dating back beyond the flood.
Can anyone else see a trend forming?
Sum ergo sum
Find
Reply
SavedByGraceThruFaith Offline
Banned
Religious Views: Jesus Christ
Posts: 352
Threads: 8
Joined: September 29, 2013
Reputation: 1
#96
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am
(October 8, 2013 at 7:25 am)Ben Davis Wrote:
(October 8, 2013 at 7:05 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: 1. I have already proved that atheistic origin science is false.
Therefore "the God did nothing" assumption has already been proven false forever.
This is an outright lie.

Quote:You cannot use dating beyond recorded history because you do not know what God did.
Another lie.

Quote:You have an assumption of no God that is already been proven false.
Yet another lie.

Quote:2. Radio carbon dating is inaccurate beyond several thousand years.
More lying.

Quote:The reason is that the CO2 levels were much higher in the past (before the flood) so the technique is useless for dating back beyond the flood.
Can anyone else see a trend forming?

The truth: You have not proven your "no God" assumption.
The truth: the topics I have posted prove the "no God" assumption false.
The truth: The "no God" assumption cannot be used to date anything beyond recorded history.
Find
Reply
Esquilax Offline
A Death Star for bad arguments.
*****
Religious Views: AF's own William Lane Craig
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation: 123
#97
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am
(October 8, 2013 at 7:22 am)max-greece Wrote: No article attached.
No proof that dating is wrong.

Gracie,

We have tree rings that go back further than 6,000 years (9,000? from memory). No need to dispute radio-dating. Tree rings - about as basic as it gets.

There's no need to provide more proof, Max. I have already proved Grace wrong: her god does not exist. It has been proven false forever.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Find
Reply
Captain Colostomy Offline
Holey Shitbag
***
Religious Views: Full of shit.
Posts: 2171
Threads: 4
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation: 33
#98
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 7:28 am
(October 8, 2013 at 7:22 am)max-greece Wrote:
(October 8, 2013 at 7:17 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Here is an article stating that CO2 levels were 20 times present levels in the past.

The article is incorrect about when that happened of course. But the evidence for much higher CO2 levels in the past is true. So if about 5000 years ago, CO2 levels were 20x todays levels, something would be measured as mush older.

The no God assumption has been proven false by this topic and the other topics I have posted.

You cannot use it for dating beyond recorded history.

No article attached.
No proof that dating is wrong.

Gracie,

We have tree rings that go back further than 6,000 years (9,000? from memory). No need to dispute radio-dating. Tree rings - about as basic as it gets.

Lol. What good would the article be, anyway? Even Grace says it's wrong...except for the part that is right.

I just read about the rings...yeah, 9000 sounds right.
Find
Reply
Tonus Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 7140
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation: 72
#99
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 7:29 am
(October 7, 2013 at 11:25 pm)popeyespappy Wrote:
(October 7, 2013 at 11:01 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Has s/he made that claim? I don't recall seeing it. If so, idiocy indeed knows no bounds.

Yes it made that claim among others such as anything that contradicts its particular views of the BuyBull isn't evidence.

BTW, it is here at the suggestion of our buddy Drich. Thanks Drich for that one buddy, and a question for you too? How many lost souls have you managed to around these parts?

http://www.christianforums.com/t7775744-5/

Maybe that is why Grace is hanging in there so long. It would not do to return a failure? Or perhaps she feels that once she finishes her series on "why I am right and you are wrong" the truth will suddenly become obvious to all? As opposed to a laboriously detailed record of how she avoided and obfuscated and straight-up denied her way through the whole mess...
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Find
Reply
SavedByGraceThruFaith Offline
Banned
Religious Views: Jesus Christ
Posts: 352
Threads: 8
Joined: September 29, 2013
Reputation: 1
#100
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 7:31 am
(October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am)Esquilax Wrote:
(October 8, 2013 at 7:22 am)max-greece Wrote: No article attached.
No proof that dating is wrong.

Gracie,

We have tree rings that go back further than 6,000 years (9,000? from memory). No need to dispute radio-dating. Tree rings - about as basic as it gets.

There's no need to provide more proof, Max. I have already proved Grace wrong: her god does not exist. It has been proven false forever.

Here is a link to the article

http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/virtualmuseum...07_1.shtml

There are many more on the Internet.

You need to be specific about your supposed tree ring proof.

1. you have not proven the "no God" assumption true. It is impossible.
2. The topics I have posted prove the "no God" assumption false.
3. The "no God" assumption cannot be used beyond recorded history
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Good Christians only may answer... Gawdzilla Sama 58 11994 September 18, 2018 at 3:22 pm
Last Post: Bob Kelso
  While Judaism may have had forced marriage war booties, i think it reasons is for it Rakie 17 4406 August 2, 2017 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Lol the bible is actually ok with pedophilia, proof from passage Rarieo 80 26463 July 29, 2017 at 12:50 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Christianity actually condones murder Rolandson 50 11836 January 21, 2017 at 10:09 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Truth in a story which is entirely dependent upon subjective interpretation Astonished 47 7639 January 10, 2017 at 8:57 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Catholicism would actually be the most likely controlled Christianity Rolandson 10 2369 January 1, 2017 at 11:44 am
Last Post: Redoubtable
  What do non-fundamentalist Christians actually believe? Fromper 66 26798 June 30, 2016 at 7:08 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  You Can't Disprove a Miracle Rhondazvous 155 19708 March 18, 2016 at 11:05 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Hi, I'm a Christian. Help Me Disprove My Religion! WishfulThinking 265 67270 October 11, 2015 at 9:20 am
Last Post: Cyberman
Question Dear Christians: What does your god actually do? Aractus 144 56036 October 9, 2015 at 6:38 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)