Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 9, 2025, 12:34 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: The truth: You have not proven your "no God" assumption.
The truth: the topics I have posted prove the "no God" assumption false.
The truth: The "no God" assumption cannot be used to date anything beyond recorded history.

The real truth: I have proved your "god" assumption wrong in every thread you post. It is based on blindness, and on foolishness. You cannot prove your "god" and since I have proven it false, the opposite, that there is no god, must be true.

It has been proven.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am)Esquilax Wrote:
(October 8, 2013 at 7:22 am)max-greece Wrote: No article attached.
No proof that dating is wrong.

Gracie,

We have tree rings that go back further than 6,000 years (9,000? from memory). No need to dispute radio-dating. Tree rings - about as basic as it gets.

There's no need to provide more proof, Max. I have already proved Grace wrong: her god does not exist. It has been proven false forever.

You are correct of course - your proof was elegantly beautiful and simple but for some reason Gracie can't see it. I was just giving her an extra prod in the right direction. At least that way she can't say we didn't try.

Delusions can be a bugger to undermine in the mind of the sufferer. If elegant solutions don't work my plan B is to hit them with mountains of evidence.
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 8, 2013 at 7:32 am)max-greece Wrote:
(October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am)Esquilax Wrote: There's no need to provide more proof, Max. I have already proved Grace wrong: her god does not exist. It has been proven false forever.

You are correct of course - your proof was elegantly beautiful and simple but for some reason Gracie can't see it. I was just giving her an extra prod in the right direction. At least that way she can't say we didn't try.

Delusions can be a bugger to undermine in the mind of the sufferer. If elegant solutions don't work my plan B is to hit them with mountains of evidence.

No link to article.

Did they use the "no God" assumption?
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 8, 2013 at 7:29 am)Tonus Wrote:
(October 7, 2013 at 11:25 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: Yes it made that claim among others such as anything that contradicts its particular views of the BuyBull isn't evidence.

BTW, it is here at the suggestion of our buddy Drich. Thanks Drich for that one buddy, and a question for you too? How many lost souls have you managed to around these parts?

http://www.christianforums.com/t7775744-5/

Maybe that is why Grace is hanging in there so long. It would not do to return a failure? Or perhaps she feels that once she finishes her series on "why I am right and you are wrong" the truth will suddenly become obvious to all? As opposed to a laboriously detailed record of how she avoided and obfuscated and straight-up denied her way through the whole mess...

Maybe Drich could set the record straight over there then?

Shah....as if.
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: The truth: You have not proven blah blah blah...
The truth: the topics I have blah blah blah...
The truth: The "no God" assumption blah blah blah...

Your ignorance is self-evident. Your comments have become white noise. I need make no further comment.
Sum ergo sum
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 8, 2013 at 7:31 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:
(October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am)Esquilax Wrote: There's no need to provide more proof, Max. I have already proved Grace wrong: her god does not exist. It has been proven false forever.

Here is a link to the article

http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/virtualmuseum...07_1.shtml

There are many more on the Internet.

You need to be specific about your supposed tree ring proof.

1. you have not proven the "no God" assumption true. It is impossible.
2. The topics I have posted prove the "no God" assumption false.
3. The "no God" assumption cannot be used beyond recorded history

Good article - no objections here - but as you say their timeline and yours are very different. Tell me - of the many more on the internet how many support your time line?
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 8, 2013 at 7:33 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: No link to article.

Did they use the "no God" assumption?

Links to articles? Assumptions? Haven't you been listening? I proved that you are wrong in your "god assumption" forever. Can you not see that?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
Tree ring dating goes back further than I thought apparently, 11,000 years:

http://www.radiocarbon.com/tree-ring-calibration.htm
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 8, 2013 at 7:33 am)Captain Colostomy Wrote: Maybe Drich could set the record straight over there then?

To a forum full of fundamentalists? Confused Fall
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 8, 2013 at 7:39 am)Tonus Wrote:
(October 8, 2013 at 7:33 am)Captain Colostomy Wrote: Maybe Drich could set the record straight over there then?

To a forum full of fundamentalists? Confused Fall

Well they won't believe one of us. Drich could make amends some by admitting Gracie got owned.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Good Christians only may answer... Gawdzilla Sama 58 13092 September 18, 2018 at 3:22 pm
Last Post: Bob Kelso
  While Judaism may have had forced marriage war booties, i think it reasons is for it Rakie 17 4581 August 2, 2017 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Lol the bible is actually ok with pedophilia, proof from passage Rarieo 80 27219 July 29, 2017 at 12:50 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Christianity actually condones murder Rolandson 50 12518 January 21, 2017 at 10:09 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Truth in a story which is entirely dependent upon subjective interpretation Astonished 47 8111 January 10, 2017 at 8:57 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Catholicism would actually be the most likely controlled Christianity Rolandson 10 2458 January 1, 2017 at 11:44 am
Last Post: Redoubtable
  What do non-fundamentalist Christians actually believe? Fromper 66 27608 June 30, 2016 at 7:08 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  You Can't Disprove a Miracle Rhondazvous 155 20888 March 18, 2016 at 11:05 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Hi, I'm a Christian. Help Me Disprove My Religion! WishfulThinking 265 69086 October 11, 2015 at 9:20 am
Last Post: Cyberman
Question Dear Christians: What does your god actually do? Aractus 144 57628 October 9, 2015 at 6:38 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)