Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
February 10, 2015 at 11:44 am
Bashing science =/= evidence for made up stories
Just thought I'd remind everyone.
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
February 10, 2015 at 11:50 am
(February 10, 2015 at 11:44 am)robvalue Wrote: Bashing science =/= evidence for made up stories
Just thought I'd remind everyone. i love science over make believe stories.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 7140
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
February 10, 2015 at 11:55 am
It's not as if there's a dearth of discussion regarding the Cambrian Explosion, or the challenges it supposedly presents to evolution, or explanations of why that's not the case. I do find it interesting that the guy who hides behind "you can't prove it didn't" suddenly doesn't accept "we're still learning about it." Perhaps he's hoping that they'll stop before science upends another of his sacred apple carts.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
February 10, 2015 at 11:57 am
People need to learn some stuff. And not from christian apologists who couldn't teach a fish to swim.
With the internet, there really is no more excuses for ignorance.
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
February 10, 2015 at 11:58 am
(February 10, 2015 at 11:57 am)robvalue Wrote: People need to learn some stuff. And not from christian apologists who couldn't teach a fish to swim.
With the internet, there really is no more excuses for ignorance.
The core of it all of the ignorance is the irrational fear in hell.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 3817
Threads: 5
Joined: November 19, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
February 10, 2015 at 12:05 pm
(This post was last modified: February 10, 2015 at 12:07 pm by Chas.)
(February 10, 2015 at 3:25 am)snowtracks Wrote: Oxygen level - This is one of 3 main factors to explain why the Cambrian event (& Avalon which brought about the ediacara [sponges & jellyfish] ) couldn’t have occurred earlier. Only through billion of years of photosynthetic activity could the earth’s atmosphere and oceans build up sufficient oxygen to support life which transpired in day 4 (biblical Hebrew contains only about 3000 words, consequently, most nouns possess multiple ‘literal definitions’. ‘Day’ has 4 one of which is ‘a long but finite time period’.)
[Citation required]
Quote:Day 5 - Sea animals & specialized land animals. Explosive speciation. For the first approx. 85% of life’s history on earth, there were no creatures we would refer to as animals. Then suddenly swarms of diverse sea animals emerged with for the first time sporting appendeges, limbs, skeltons, specialized organs, none related to the ediacaras. This sudden appearance is acknowledge as a challenge to the macro-evolutionary model.
You do know that "suddenly" in that context is 10,000,000 years. It is sudden on an evolutionary scale, not a human scale.
Quote: Ref: Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, http://terebess.hu/keletkultinfo/The_Bli...hmaker.pdf - "For example the Cambrian strata of rocks, vintage about 600 million years, are the oldest ones in which we find most of the major invertebrate groups. And we find many of them already in an advanced state of evolution, the very first time they appear. It is as though they were just planted there, without any evolutionary history".
And you not only dishonestly took that out of context, you stupidly did so when he has said you would.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Posts: 957
Threads: 1
Joined: October 10, 2013
Reputation:
2
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
February 13, 2015 at 1:12 am
(This post was last modified: February 13, 2015 at 1:19 am by snowtracks.)
(February 10, 2015 at 7:56 am)whateverist Wrote: (February 10, 2015 at 3:25 am)snowtracks Wrote: The snowball event before Cambrian would have been deleterious to the evolutionary modeling.
Even if you want to shoe horn in a place for a creator god, wouldn't His constant fiddling indicate a level of incompetence incompatible with His alleged omni powers? If He really were all that, shouldn't He have been able to fire off a big bang which would have netted life on earth leading to life as we know it - without any further meddling? What reason have you to think otherwise short of resorting to that opening book of the OT? There are multi-purposes for God creating the universe; these purposes are being accomplished using natural law over a limited time frame. Occasionally, He employs natural law and natural phenomena in an extraordinary way to bring about His will…for instance the Red Sea crossing. http://ed5015.tripod.com/BRedSeaCrossing.htm, and even less occasionally, He operates supernaturally which is outside of natural law by overriding the laws of physics, such as gravity and the laws of thermodynamics. Examples: the historical Christianity belief in creation ex nihilo, and Christ walking on water. Why does God ‘fiddle’ around and not use supernatural miracles exclusively, one reason is undoubtedly it may imply that nature is God’s adversary; He created the forces of nature to serve His purposes. It's a fallacy that God's sole purpose in creating the universe is to provide a perfectly comfortable environment for life, and especially human life.
(February 8, 2015 at 12:41 pm)Esquilax Wrote: (February 7, 2015 at 2:37 am)snowtracks Wrote: Darwin had hoped later fossil discoveries would eventually eliminate what he regarded as the one outstanding anomaly associated with theory. Ref: Origin of Species, page 307 (I have it on E-book as that). The anomaly he was referring to was the Cambrian Period - (ref. Burgess Shale http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burgess_Shale) - wherein appeared in the fossil records was ’disparity’ (major differences in form, phyla level) without prior ’diversity’ (minor diff. among organisms, species level ).
The future fossil evidence he had hope was never realized. Been 150 years old man, time to call it a day.
Except that we have plenty of explanation of the Cambrian period, both in fossils, and in other areas. They're here, though I doubt you'll even bother to click the link. For example, oxygen levels- which have a positive correlation with diversity in Eukaryotic life- rose just prior to, and during the Cambrian period, due to reaching a saturation point that allowed it to exist as a gas. Additionally, sufficient ozone to protect against incoming UV light formed around that time too; you don't think that those two factors, both of which are correlated with increased diversity among biological organisms, might have contributed toward the increased diversity among biological organisms in the Cambrian period?
Just pretending there's no explanation for this is lying, Snowy. Not that this is a surprise from you, at this point; unthinking scrabbling to defend the indefensible via arguments from ignorance is your stock in trade. Oh, like I didn't know there are opposing viewpoints.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
February 13, 2015 at 1:28 am
(This post was last modified: February 13, 2015 at 1:39 am by dyresand.)
(February 13, 2015 at 1:12 am)snowtracks Wrote: There are multi-purposes for God creating the universe; these purposes are being accomplished using natural law over a limited time frame. Occasionally, He employs natural law and natural phenomena in an extraordinary way to bring about His will…for instance the Red Sea crossing. http://ed5015.tripod.com/BRedSeaCrossing.htm, and even less occasionally, He operates supernaturally which is outside of natural law by overriding the laws of physics, such as gravity and the laws of thermodynamics. Examples: the historical Christianity belief in creation ex nihilo, and Christ walking on water. Why does God ‘fiddle’ around and not use supernatural miracles exclusively, one reason is undoubtedly it may imply that nature is God’s adversary; He created the forces of nature to serve His purposes. It's a fallacy that God's sole purpose in creating the universe is to provide a perfectly comfortable environment for life, and especially human life.
in other words no god and or deity is not needed.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
February 13, 2015 at 3:15 am
(This post was last modified: February 13, 2015 at 3:15 am by robvalue.)
How come you know so much about God, his properties, reasons and intentions? All theists seem to be able to talk through the science-proof barrier they hide God behind, and know just what he's thinking and why he had to condone slavery in "that culture".
Could it be people are talking to themselves?
Posts: 7140
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
February 16, 2015 at 10:45 am
(February 13, 2015 at 1:12 am)snowtracks Wrote: Oh, like I didn't know there are opposing viewpoints. Pro tip: some of them are much more valid than others.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
|