Hi all,
Are there any Level 7's on the Dawkins scale on this forum? Why are you so sure there is no god?
Are there any Level 7's on the Dawkins scale on this forum? Why are you so sure there is no god?
|
Any Level 7's out there?
|
|
Hi all,
Are there any Level 7's on the Dawkins scale on this forum? Why are you so sure there is no god?
6.999999999999999 but the likelihood of any god existing is remote and jesus is just plain silly.
7. No evidence for any god. Considering what's written in your Bible; I find it preposterous that adult human beings take this account, literal or otherwise, as an accurate description of a being capable of creating a universe. It's at this point, as Min pointed out, that it becomes silly.
I cant say i completly like the dawkins scale but i consider myself a seven in some sense,although I'm completly sure he doesnt exist I'm open to legitiment evidence that would conjurdict my world views. Iam certain he doesnt exist because the way he is described matches something imagined by ancient people .
ALL PRAISE THE ONE TRUE GOD ZALGO
I have a level 7 fighter/cleric, if that counts.....
(January 7, 2014 at 8:16 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: Kudos for the DnD reference!Thankee-sai But, like others said too, I'm not a huge fan of that scale. It's too, 'restrictive' for lack of a better term. It's like forcing someone to choose their sexuality with only straight, gay, or bi as the options. It neglects all the nuances in between. (January 7, 2014 at 8:13 pm)cato123 Wrote: 7. No evidence for any god. Considering what's written in your Bible; I find it preposterous that adult human beings take this account, literal or otherwise, as an accurate description of a being capable of creating a universe. It's at this point, as Min pointed out, that it becomes silly."god" with a small "g" I mean, not necessarily the God of the Bible. But Level 7 means there's not even a possibility that there is a god, meaning you don't just need a lack of evidence for a god's existence, but some very convincing evidence against it. Right? Or am I misunderstanding the Dawkins scale? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|