Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 14, 2024, 6:04 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Undefeated" Apologetic Argument
#31
RE: "Undefeated" Apologetic Argument
(January 29, 2014 at 5:12 am)Alex K Wrote:
(January 29, 2014 at 12:06 am)Genius Evil Wrote: In fact, you could replace "the universe" with "God" and conclude that Theists "are irrational, illogical, and have no evidence".

See my post #6

Ah. I skimmed through it earlier, read it now. Nice post.
Reply
#32
"Undefeated" Apologetic Argument
(January 24, 2014 at 1:57 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: So, I read Elliot's entire argument on his website, and...not impressed.

His entire argument is predicated on a false dichotomy. Not only that, his acronym SCPNCEU stands for, " Something can come from ''PURE-Nothingness'' and then create entire universe(s)."

No one (except ignorant or dishonest apologists) claims anything like this.

So he is also guilty of a straw man.

If I have time later, I might post more on why the Elliot argument is invalid and unsound. But if you google 'refuting the Elliot argument', there is more than enough good refutations to be found.

I mean, come on, this Elliot guy turned off comments on his YT vid because he was getting mercilessly slapped around.

See also: Every ontological argument since people started challenging ontological arguments.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Thoughts on this apologetic Hungry Hungry Hippo 35 10915 July 20, 2015 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: Cato



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)