Any Other Anarchists Here?

[Chas]

Saying that Nazi "eugenics" makes all eugenics bad is like saying that Stalinist democracy makes all democracy bad.

"Stalinist democracy"? You are delusional.

[EgoRaptor]

Saying that Nazi "eugenics" makes all eugenics bad is like saying that Stalinist democracy makes all democracy bad.

"Stalinist democracy"? You are delusional.

You fail to see the point I was making. Stalinism isn't really democracy, just as killing people & forced sterilizations of those deemed "promiscuous" isn't really eugenics.

[Chas]

"Stalinist democracy"? You are delusional.

You fail to see the point I was making. Stalinism isn't really democracy, just as killing people & forced sterilizations of those deemed "promiscuous" isn't really eugenics.

I saw the point you were attempting to make, but you failed to do so.

[KUSA]

Which is an unjustified assumption. Essentially pack animals, human beings seem to require a leader.

Furthermore, the notion of people looking after themselves won't work, either. Suppose I show up at your house, beat you senseless with a club, and nick all your goods. As an anarchist, you can't call the cops, you can't get your friends to come after me, you can't sue me, etc., as all these things require you to be assisted by other people (hence, not 'looking after yourself'). More extremely, I could not just beat you, but KILL you, and I would suffer no consequences.

Sorry, mate, but it's just not on. Anarchism is a pipe dream in the purest sense of the term.

Boru

That is why I believe we need eugenics to breed better, more individualistic people before the state can be abolished.

Eugenics is not necessary as the singularity is near. Read this and you will understand. http://www.kurzweilai.net/singularity-q-a

Until then you should just keep eating your Cheetos and watching naked girls on your computer because your views of politics are insane.

[EgoRaptor]

That is why I believe we need eugenics to breed better, more individualistic people before the state can be abolished.

Eugenics is not necessary as the singularity is near. Read this and you will understand. http://www.kurzweilai.net/singularity-q-a

Until then you should just keep eating your Cheetos and watching naked girls on your computer because your views of politics are insane.

I don't eat cheetos.

[KUSA]

Eugenics is not necessary as the singularity is near. Read this and you will understand. http://www.kurzweilai.net/singularity-q-a

Until then you should just keep eating your Cheetos and watching naked girls on your computer because your views of politics are insane.

I don't eat cheetos.

Well good then your pecker won't turn orange.

[FlyingNarwhal]

I don't eat cheetos.

Well good then your pecker won't turn orange.

Indeed. It's a very well known fact that a side effect of eating cheetos is Oompa Loompa dick.

[EgoRaptor]

Anyone have anything valuable to contribute?

[KUSA]

Anarchy can't work. If you don't have a government of your own then somebody else's government will conquer your land and then be your government.

[Ryantology]

I would not support the euthanasia of anyone. I support the voluntary sterilization of the retarded (shouldn't be hard to convince them to go along with it).

Specifically because it would be very easy to do that, "retards" can't grant legal consent on matters like this, making it impossible.

I support the compulsory sterilization of mass murderers.

I can see three extremely huge holes in this idea:

1. Mass murderers won't reproduce because there's virtually no opportunity to do this in prison.
2. You can't stop a person from reproducing and then committing mass murder.
3. "Mass murder" is not a genetic trait that can be passed on.

I really, really don't think you're thinking through this very well.