The Bible Takes It Up The Ass, Again!

[Godscreated]

Listen very closely, I care nothing about camels in Iraq or any other place I made a point about certain animals do not have to be domesticated to be extremely useful to humans. So why don't you get with the program and understand what position someone is arguing from.

GC

You seem to be under the mistaken impression that I give a flying fuck about what you were arguing about. My point still stands; that this new information (however you interpret it) does nothing to validate extraordinary claims in the Bible. As far as the Bible is concerned, it's a trivial piece of information; that if true is trivially true. This thread doesn't revolve around you and your ego dumbass.

I have no ego about this it's people with, oh I just can't lose an argument to a Christian, who have egos that cause them to go completely dumb, that would be you.

GC

[Minimalist]

May a (domesticated) elephant shit on your bible-thumping head.

[max-greece]

May a (domesticated) elephant shit on your bible-thumping head.

Oh but you do make me LOL from time to time.

Kudos for that - but I wouldn't wish an elephant to shit on his head - maybe fart in his general direction....

[Ryantology]

Kudos for that - but I wouldn't wish an elephant to shit on his head - maybe fart in his general direction....

Nor would I. Waste of perfectly good elephant shit.

[Minimalist]

You guys are waaayyy too kind.

[Godscreated]

Listen, fuckhead...read it and weep and guess who has more credibility?
A useless bible thumping shitstain like you or these guys?

http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/ad031e/ad031e0g.htm

India has a fascinating history of domesticating wild elephants. Lahiri Choudhury (1988) has traced, on the basis of rock paintings, the history of domesticated elephants in India to about 6000 B.C. Seals of the Indus Valley civilization (2500-1500 B.C.) also suggest the presence of domesticated elephants in India at that time.

It's you Mr. Idiot that needs to listen I gave you the scientific definition of domestication, yet you ignore it be cause you find some article that is not scientific and use it to try and prove your losing point of view. You can continue to be the real idiot here or you could go look up the definition and the scientific reviews, like I did, and learn something. You do old dogs like you can learn something. Relying on someone who is only guessing in an article what was done long ago can't compare to the experts who say elephants are not domesticated. But if you wish to stay stupid do it here you get in an argument with a biologist you will look like the fool, not that you do not already. I guess it's okay for atheist to ignore the key words in the article, they would be wild and suggest. Wild animals must be tamed before domestication and elephants today are still taken from the wild to tame for domestic work, an animal that does work for man does not by necessity make them domesticated, but then the lions and tigers used in circuses would be domesticated by your thinking. Why do you insist on making your self look stupid, is winning this argument that important to you. Honestly I thought you were smarter than this, but I guess your need to win at all cost has made you stupid.
The reason I used elephants to start with is because I thought you were smart enough to know they were not a domesticated animal, just an animal that has been tamed to do domestic work. I thought you really knew what domestication is and that wild animals had to be tamed, such as elephants, before they could be domesticated, such as the camel, the camel could have been tamed long before it was domesticated to do the domestic work man desired.
By the way camels lived in Canaan long before the Israelites took the land, yet for some unknown reason archaeologist seem to believe these were not domesticated and maybe not, but they very well could have been tamed to do the domestic work man desired from them.

GC

---

Never play hardball with Min. You'll get burned to a crisp.

Protecting your god means he is no god, my God needs no protection.

GC

---

"GC takes it up the ass, again."

Your delusional state will come back to haunt you deary.

GC

---

May a (domesticated) elephant shit on your bible-thumping head.

Oh but you do make me LOL from time to time.

Kudos for that - but I wouldn't wish an elephant to shit on his head - maybe fart in his general direction....

Min's stuck his head up an elephants butt to hide his stupidity.

GC

[Jacob(smooth)]

I'm hoping for the "yo mama" stage any post now!

[Ryantology]

Yo mama's so Godschild, she won't fuck a doorknob until she marries it.

[Minimalist]

Listen, fuckhead...read it and weep and guess who has more credibility?
A useless bible thumping shitstain like you or these guys?

http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/ad031e/ad031e0g.htm

It's you Mr. Idiot that needs to listen I gave you the scientific definition of domestication, yet you ignore it be cause you find some article that is not scientific and use it to try and prove your losing point of view. You can continue to be the real idiot here or you could go look up the definition and the scientific reviews, like I did, and learn something. You do old dogs like you can learn something. Relying on someone who is only guessing in an article what was done long ago can't compare to the experts who say elephants are not domesticated. But if you wish to stay stupid do it here you get in an argument with a biologist you will look like the fool, not that you do not already. I guess it's okay for atheist to ignore the key words in the article, they would be wild and suggest. Wild animals must be tamed before domestication and elephants today are still taken from the wild to tame for domestic work, an animal that does work for man does not by necessity make them domesticated, but then the lions and tigers used in circuses would be domesticated by your thinking. Why do you insist on making your self look stupid, is winning this argument that important to you. Honestly I thought you were smarter than this, but I guess your need to win at all cost has made you stupid.
The reason I used elephants to start with is because I thought you were smart enough to know they were not a domesticated animal, just an animal that has been tamed to do domestic work. I thought you really knew what domestication is and that wild animals had to be tamed, such as elephants, before they could be domesticated, such as the camel, the camel could have been tamed long before it was domesticated to do the domestic work man desired.
By the way camels lived in Canaan long before the Israelites took the land, yet for some unknown reason archaeologist seem to believe these were not domesticated and maybe not, but they very well could have been tamed to do the domestic work man desired from them.

GC

---

Never play hardball with Min. You'll get burned to a crisp.

Protecting your god means he is no god, my God needs no protection.

GC

---

"GC takes it up the ass, again."

Your delusional state will come back to haunt you deary.

GC

---

Oh but you do make me LOL from time to time.

Kudos for that - but I wouldn't wish an elephant to shit on his head - maybe fart in his general direction....

Min's stuck his head up an elephants butt to hide his stupidity.

GC

Be a good xtian, G-C.....



Truthfully, I think I'd prefer an elephant as a neighbor rather than you.

[Jacob(smooth)]

Yo mama's so Godschild, she won't fuck a doorknob until she marries it.

Yeah? Well yo mama's so enrico, she thinks she's on a higher plane of consciousness!

We may be onto something here...