It's the Daily Kos.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 2, 2026, 4:36 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Damned Republicunts
|
Yep. I am that asshat who didn't even click the link. I'll take the dunce cap...
 RE: Damned Republicunts
April 15, 2014 at 8:09 am
(This post was last modified: April 15, 2014 at 8:09 am by Tonus.)
I guess it's not surprising that a Christian would consider there to be more freedom under an oppressive regime that tries to control everyone's thoughts and actions.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould  
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist  (April 21, 2014 at 5:33 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Why "female" circumcision? So snipping of pee-pee ends is still acceptable?Female so-called "circumcision" should be called "female castration". When they cut off a woman's clitoris, it destroys her ability to ever enjoy sex. In my view, it permanently ruins her as a sexual being. It's a barbaric practice of maiming that has no place in a civilized society. I am also against male circumcision without the consent of the person being circumcised. Male circumcision also has its detrimental effects. As I understand it, it reduces his pleasure during sex. However, he can still have sex and enjoy it. It doesn't ruin his sexuality. It also has a subjective plus side in my view: I kind of like the aesthetic look of cut cocks. That may be just me. So in sum, it's a matter of how severe the consequences are. In my opinion, it's far more dire in the case with females and I rank the practice alongside male castration.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist (April 21, 2014 at 4:08 pm)Minimalist Wrote: And D-P, they prefer to solve non-existent problems. So much easier than having to deal with reality. Kind of like the amendments against Sharia law? You know, what a great idea! We should have an amendment against Sharia law. In fact, it should be an amendment against all forms of religiously imposed sectarian laws. It should forbid the government to establish a religion. In fact, let's use those words "congress shall make no law establishing a religion." Can we retroactively make that the very first federal constitutional amendment? This sounds really important and the amendments should start with that one. ...oh wait...
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
