And this thread itself is, of course, an example of confirmation bias.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 8:41 am
Thread Rating:
Most frustrating Fallacies that Religious people bring up?
|
(April 11, 2014 at 12:55 pm)alpha male Wrote: And this thread itself is, of course, an example of confirmation bias. Do tell.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Atheists also use fallacies, but those tend to go unnoticed by other atheists.
(April 11, 2014 at 1:38 pm)alpha male Wrote: Atheists also use fallacies, but those tend to go unnoticed by other atheists. Do tell.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist (April 10, 2014 at 3:39 pm)Beccs Wrote: Argument from personal experience is one that pisses me off.That's less annoying than "I had this experience that I won't explain..." It leads me to think that the experience is the sort of thing that is either easy to offer alternatives for, and/or points to the person being a loon.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould (April 11, 2014 at 1:38 pm)alpha male Wrote: Atheists also use fallacies, but those tend to go unnoticed by other atheists. Can anyone else taste the rich, creamy irony of the massive Tu Quoque fallacy in this sentence?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Not sure I want to.
RE: Most frustrating Fallacies that Religious people bring up?
April 11, 2014 at 9:15 pm
(This post was last modified: April 11, 2014 at 9:15 pm by Coffee Jesus.)
Here's an example of one I find particularly annoying, albeit I haven't heard it often:
Some guy the other day was trying to argue that because there are people in the world that believe unmarried non-virgins should be killed, that means that being an unmarried non-virgin is wrong. What fallacy is that anyway? At first I thought argumentum ad populum, but that doesn't seem quite right... |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)