RE: Unconventional opinions
April 17, 2014 at 11:44 pm
(This post was last modified: April 17, 2014 at 11:44 pm by Losty.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 6, 2025, 11:57 pm
Thread Rating:
Unconventional opinions
|
RE: Unconventional opinions
April 18, 2014 at 12:08 am
(This post was last modified: April 18, 2014 at 12:20 am by Coffee Jesus.)
edited... a lot
Thing is, men more greatly distinguish between whom they'll sleep with and whom they'll have a long-term relationship with. It's social psychology. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23750377 "According to the parental investment model, females frequently have more stringent criteria for the traits they will accept in a mate because they have a relatively larger investment in each offspring. [...] Males had lower requirements for a sexual partner than did females, but were nearly as selective as females when considering requirements for a long-term partner." Intelligence was one such "requirement" that men greatly reduced in the sexual partner condition, putting it even below their requirement for a date. The female sample dropped this requirement in the sexual partner condition as well, but not nearly as much as the male sample.
My requirement is that she is a cum guzzling slut. I want the bitch to blow bubbles with my cum.
RE: Unconventional opinions
April 18, 2014 at 12:16 am
(This post was last modified: April 18, 2014 at 12:17 am by Sedna.)
(April 18, 2014 at 12:08 am)Coffee Jesus Wrote: Thing is, men distinguish between whom they'll sleep with, and whom they'll date. It's social psychology.Things like that are based off averages for the sexes. They aren't rules and may be malleable. Many men may do that. It's misleading to not add that qualifier. _______________________________________________________________________ Here's my unconventional opinion: parties suck.
Death is not something to be afraid of. Death is cool. Death is funny. Death is SEXAY.
![]()
But it's still good to know.
By the way, I really messed up that post, but I jsut fixed it. (April 18, 2014 at 12:08 am)Coffee Jesus Wrote: Thing is, men distinguish between whom they'll sleep with, and whom they'll date. It's social psychology. I don't see how this is relevant and everyone has stricter requirements for relationships, but men will lower their standards for just sex. How can you get an accurate result on this? Men will lie and say their standards are even lower than they really are for sex where many women will lie and say they won't even have sex outside a serious relationship. And many women really won't have sex outside a serious relationship simply because it's a social taboo for women to be slutty. RE: Unconventional opinions
April 18, 2014 at 12:29 am
(This post was last modified: April 18, 2014 at 12:29 am by Coffee Jesus.)
(April 17, 2014 at 10:03 pm)Deidre32 Wrote: The last two guys I've dated were just that...not necessarily man whores, but they looked good, but if you were to perform an autopsy, there'd be nothing inside. Just empty lying jerks. Time to stop dating good looking empty shells. :/ By extension, does that make me good looking? ![]() ![]() (April 17, 2014 at 9:46 pm)Losty Wrote:(April 17, 2014 at 9:41 pm)Deidre32 Wrote: Yea, men are called "players." Women are called whores, sluts, etc. If I may make my unconvential opinion, women shouldn't be shamed for having sex (sluts are good girls), but men deserve to be cooler for having casual sex. There is more skill needed for a man to casually fuck women, then for a woman to casually fuck men. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)