Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 14, 2024, 10:12 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid
#1
Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid
Certainly, cogintive dissonance plays a role.

Edit: but the above comment is more an aside. The actual focus is on peer validation below)

However, from having seen it first hand, I am also aware that peer validation also plays a major role.

Theists on their theistic forums are fond of spouting ill logic and congratulating themselves on the merits of each others silly beliefs more than they are of accessing the invalid arguments they view as on par with gospel.

That is why when they come here, they are confused that we cannot understand or accept their brand of logic, especially since their fellow theists think their thoughts are brilliant beyond the works of major philosophers.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#2
RE: Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid
(April 30, 2014 at 7:42 am)Kitanetos Wrote: Certainly, cogintive dissonance plays a role.

However, from having seen it first hand, I am also aware that peer validation also plays a major role.

Theists on their theistic forums are fond of spouting ill logic and congratulating themselves on the merits of each others silly beliefs more than they are of accessing the invalid arguments they view as on par with gospel.

That is why when they come here, they are confused that we cannot understand or accept their brand of logic, especially since their fellow theists think their thoughts are brilliant beyond the works of major philosophers.

We are all subject to cognitive dissonance, how, specifically, do you see this being an issue for someone who is a theist as opposed to someone who is not a theist?

MM
"The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions" - Leonardo da Vinci

"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment)
Reply
#3
RE: Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid
The focus was not on cognitive dissonance so much as peer validation. The cognitive dissonance comment was more an aside of an already apparent truth.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#4
RE: Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid
(April 30, 2014 at 8:46 am)Kitanetos Wrote: The focus was not on cognitive dissonance so much as peer validation. The cognitive dissonance comment was more an aside of an already apparent truth.

I understand your view on peer validation and I can see how that might be part of the overall picture but I can't quite see what concepts or thoughts you see as conflicting for theists in particular.

MM
"The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions" - Leonardo da Vinci

"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment)
Reply
#5
RE: Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid
(April 30, 2014 at 9:23 am)ManMachine Wrote: but I can't quite see what concepts or thoughts you see as conflicting for theists in particular.

MM

I am uncertain what you are attempting to state here. Please elaborate.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#6
RE: Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid
Disclaimer:
I have never been a theist in real life or played one on television. I can only comment on my perspective on their behavior.

The model I use for explaining the observed behaviors of theists combines elements of evolution by means of natural selection and game theory.
I believe that religions, as self organizing and self perpetuating systems of observed regularity evolve to suit the environments they inhabit. The ones which lose that adaptive capability or have their environments change sufficiently go extinct. Nobody sacrifices to Athena these days. Religions are aggregates of their members. I have not seen convincing evidence that religions are self aware, though they have evolved self protective behaviors which serve to perpetuate and propagate them. This could be described as intentional. Religions are aggregates of their members. If the members change behaviors, so do their religions.

In game theory, one sets up payoff matrices based on input parameters. Offers of salvation or damnation are inputs and expected eternal bliss or torture are the presumed payoffs for the theist. In this context the truth of a proposition is simply another input. If the payoff is seen to be optimal by the player it will be selected whether true or false. This is not necessarily conscious or rational behavior. In the case of religious behavior I separate theists into sheep and shepherds. The sheep play a herd game in which banding together provides mutual protection and a greater influence than an individual could wield by itself. The shepherd strategy is one which uses greater independence and intellectual ability to use the power afforded by the flock to its individual advantage. These behaviors are each seen to be optimal by its practitioner. That condition is a Nash equilibrium/evolutionary stable scenario in which each player is playing a locally optimized strategy which still may be maladaptive compared to some other global strategy. But as the player cannot see past the local strategy, they persist in what may externally appear to be stupid, stubborn and self destructive behavior. To them it is their best play. The sheep and shepherd interaction forms the religion.
In American TV evangelical protestantism the sheep and shepherd model might be better described as the sheep and wolves model.
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat? Huh
Reply
#7
RE: Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid
(April 30, 2014 at 7:42 am)Kitanetos Wrote: That is why when they come here, they are confused that we cannot understand or accept their brand of logic

Confirmation bias you see the other way around here. People instinctualy herd together and share ideologies.
Reply
#8
RE: Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid
(April 30, 2014 at 11:12 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Confirmation bias you see the other way around here. People instinctualy herd together and share ideologies.

The difference being the atheistic herd mentality is based on reality whereas the theistic side is based on faithfullness (the thesaurus actually has this as a synonym for unreality, hehe).
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#9
RE: Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid
(April 30, 2014 at 11:16 am)Kitanetos Wrote:
(April 30, 2014 at 11:12 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Confirmation bias you see the other way around here. People instinctualy herd together and share ideologies.

The difference being the atheistic herd mentality is based on reality whereas the theistic side is based on faithfullness (the thesaurus actually has this as a synonym for unreality, hehe).

Herd mentality is just as bad on either side. I won't pop your bubble and tell you how they sum up the atheist position Wink
Reply
#10
RE: Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid
(April 30, 2014 at 11:24 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Herd mentality is just as bad on either side. I won't pop your bubble and tell you how they sum up the atheist position Wink

It is only bad if the ideals/beliefs within the herd are not based on reality.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How often do your beliefs change? Ahriman 37 4122 January 23, 2022 at 10:03 pm
Last Post: paulpablo
  The soft toys parents hope connect kids to their faith zebo-the-fat 13 1721 October 31, 2021 at 3:50 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
Exclamation Why Atheism is Incoherent & You Aren't as Smart as You Think You Are Seax 60 6829 March 19, 2021 at 9:43 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  Theists, tell me, an atheist, why your God has neglected to show himself to me? ignoramus 75 27685 March 5, 2021 at 6:49 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Are there any theists here who think God wants, or will take care of, Global Warming? Duty 16 4230 January 19, 2020 at 11:50 am
Last Post: Smedders
  My views on religious doctrine and beliefs robvalue 9 1299 October 2, 2018 at 7:06 am
Last Post: Cod
  This Will Cause Believers To Lose Their Shit Minimalist 36 9635 March 30, 2018 at 11:14 am
Last Post: sdelsolray
  Christians and Their Homework! chimp3 78 12187 March 6, 2018 at 2:40 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Republicans seem hell bent on proving their god does not exist Silver 7 2635 December 23, 2017 at 4:23 am
Last Post: WinterHold
  How and why can people ignore their God’s immoral ways? Greatest I am 129 24100 November 27, 2017 at 9:35 am
Last Post: Cod



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)