Posts: 2177
Threads: 45
Joined: June 5, 2013
Reputation:
39
RE: The church to end all churches
May 25, 2014 at 4:20 am
(May 24, 2014 at 2:15 pm)Lek Wrote: (May 24, 2014 at 2:25 am)oukoida Wrote: Actually, I have a problem with all organized religions. I talked about christianity just because it is the example I know best and because that's what you were talking about.
If you say "the fruit of organized christianity is evident all over the world" of course people are going to reply with something about christianity.
I am ok with every kind of religion as long as it does not harm anyone (as I wrote before, the most important Italian anti-mafia association is led by a Catholic priest who is a great person), but inevitably every organized religion will know corruption and dishonesty, since organized religion implies power and authority which in turn imply a competition for their control.
Name an institution with power and authority that does all good without corruption or misdeeds, for example civil governments, schools, hospitals, etc. Would the world be better off without them?
Now that's what I call aiming low.
Basically what you are saying is that the Church is no worse than any other institution. In other words the benefit of being God's institution is zero.
And that is your target state!
Of course - in that the actual function of the Catholic church (for example) appear to be to act as a safe haven for paedophiles where it will not only not judge them but it will actively hide, protect and move them from one place to another (ensuring a steady supply of unsuspecting child victims) I think I can understand setting your targets this low.
Kuusi palaa, ja on viimeinen kerta kun annan vaimoni laittaa jouluvalot!
Posts: 3405
Threads: 33
Joined: July 17, 2013
Reputation:
43
RE: The church to end all churches
May 26, 2014 at 2:17 am
(This post was last modified: May 26, 2014 at 2:21 am by Lucanus.)
(May 25, 2014 at 12:39 pm)Lek Wrote: (May 25, 2014 at 3:30 am)oukoida Wrote: You've basically just said that religion is founded on rational premises
My comment was directed more to "functional to society's existence and well-being", but ok.
In that case, religion is unnecessary or even damaging to social structures. Irrational beliefs hold people back and, in the long run, they tend to slow down progress.
Also, if you have two or more religions, both of which count a good number of the population, stay sure that religious tensions will arise because of the fundamentalists on each side.
Besides, secular societies are often richer and generally offer a better standard of living than more religious ones. You don't need a religion for your society's well being!
For what I can see, religion is something we have invented to make sense of the world and to make sense of death. And it's fucking poor at that since it's so clear that it is all made up.
"Every luxury has a deep price. Every indulgence, a cosmic cost. Each fiber of pleasure you experience causes equivalent pain somewhere else. This is the first law of emodynamics [sic]. Joy can be neither created nor destroyed. The balance of happiness is constant.
Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped.
Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses.
Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder.
Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids."